Business Day

Thai agencies get draconian cyber powers

Businesses and activists decry ‘cyber martial law’

- Patpicha Tanakasemp­ipat Bangkok

Thailand’s military-appointed parliament on Thursday passed a controvers­ial cybersecur­ity law that gives sweeping powers to state agencies, despite concerns from businesses and activists over judicial oversight and potential abuse of power.

The Cybersecur­ity Act, approved unanimousl­y, is the latest in a wave of new laws in Asian countries that assert government control over the internet. Civil liberties advocates, internet companies and business groups have protested against the legislatio­n, saying it would sacrifice privacy and the rule of law, and warning compliance burdens could drive foreign businesses out of Thailand.

The military government has pushed for several laws it said would support the digital economy, including an amendment to the Computer Crime Act in 2017, which has been used to crack down on dissent.

Internet freedom activists have called the legislatio­n “cyber martial law”, as it encompasse­s all procedures from everyday encounters of slow internet connection­s to nationwide attacks on critical infrastruc­ture. If a cybersecur­ity situation reached a critical level, the legislatio­n allows the military-led National Security Council to override all procedures with its own law.

“Despite some wording improvemen­ts, the contentiou­s issues are all still there,” Arthit Suriyawong­kul, an advocate with the Thai Netizen Network, told Reuters.

The law allows the National Cybersecur­ity Committee to summon individual­s for questionin­g and enter private property without court orders in case of actual or anticipate­d “serious cyber threats”.

A new committee will have sweeping powers to access computer data and networks, make copies of informatio­n and seize devices. Court warrants are not required in “emergency cases”, and criminal penalties will be imposed for those who do not comply with orders.

Thailand’s military government already censors the internet and often casts criticism as a threat to national security.

Legislator­s also unanimousl­y passed the Personal Data Protection Act, intended to imitate the EU’s general data protection regulation. The legislatio­n does not require internatio­nal firms to store data locally, but businesses have raised concerns about its territoria­l applicabil­ity.

The data protection law, effective after a one-year transition period, will apply not only to companies located in Thailand but to overseas companies that collect, use or disclose personal data of subjects in Thailand, specifical­ly for advertisem­ents and “behaviour monitoring”.

“It is unrealisti­c for any one regime to aspire to centralise the delivery of privacy protection­s for the entire world in just one regulator,” said Asia Internet Coalition, a Singapore-based group that represents internet companies including Google.

Supporters of the laws hailed them as long overdue.

“The two laws are crucial to help Thailand keep up with neighbours and the world,” said Saowanee Suwannache­ep, chair of the ad hoc parliament­ary committee that worked on the legislatio­n.

THAILAND’S MILITARY GOVERNMENT ALREADY CENSORS THE INTERNET AND OFTEN CASTS CRITICISM AS A THREAT TO SECURITY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa