Business Day

Zimbabwean rendition case a total conspiracy — McBride

- Amil Umraw

Former Independen­t Police Investigat­ive Directorat­e (Ipid) boss Robert McBride has described the controvers­ial “Zimbabwean rendition” case, which led to the suspension of senior Hawks officials, as a “conspiracy from start to finish”.

This was the first high-profile case McBride, who was testifying before the state capture inquiry on Thursday, was confronted with when he was appointed in March 2014.

The case was widely seen as a political manoeuvre to have former Hawks boss Anwa Dramat and his Gauteng commander, Shadrack Sibiya, removed. The same case resulted in former police minister Nathi Nhleko wrongfully suspending McBride a year after his appointmen­t.

Sibiya and Dramat both stood accused of planning and executing an operation in 2010 that led to the illegal repatriati­on of five Zimbabwean­s wanted by that country’s police for the murder of a senior officer.

An investigat­ion by Ipid, conducted before McBride’s arrival, recommende­d that the pair be prosecuted criminally on charges of kidnapping and defeating the ends of justice.

McBride said when he arrived at Ipid he was briefed on the rendition case by Matthews Sesoko (then acting Ipid national head of investigat­ions) and Innocent Khuba (then acting provincial head of Ipid in Limpopo).

“Khuba said to me, ‘boss, let me be open with you from the beginning. I was concerned and scared about this case from the day it was given to me’,” he said.

“In the initial weeks I didn’t know there existed a report from the report given to me by Khuba, there was a clear understand­ing who the suspects were and the roles they played. I asked who was involved, at what stage and what crime was committed at the various stages

It indicated a conspiracy from start to finish,” McBride said.

“I was under the impression that the investigat­ion’s integrity had been compromise­d.”

He requested all the evidence be reviewed. After the review, Ipid drafted a second report, which recommende­d that there should be no prosecutio­n of Dramat or Sibiya because there was a lack of evidence.

But months later, after Nhleko was appointed, he set up a reference group whose members approached Ipid for a briefing on its high-profile cases. Members of the team, according to McBride, requested a copy of the entire docket on the rendition saga, along with all the exhibits. Their request was backed by a letter from Nhleko demanding compliance.

McBride handed over the file, and just days later Dramat was suspended.

A statement from the police ministry, McBride recalled, said Dramat was suspended as a result of the recommenda­tions contained in a report by Ipid. It appeared to McBride that the ministry had based its decision on the initial report which was finalised before he arrived at Ipid and, which by his own account, was signed off by Khuba.

McBride said Ipid released a statement clarifying that it had not recommende­d Dramat’s suspension.

Nhleko suspended McBride in March 2015 on allegation­s that he had altered the initial report to clear Dramat and Sibiya.

McBride took the decision to court and won the case.

 ??  ?? Robert McBride
Robert McBride

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa