Business Day

Out-of-office work adds stress

• Measures taken to combat coronaviru­s mean less control over glitches and miscommuni­cation, but could change the trading world forever

- Saikat Chatterjee and Dhara Ranasinghe London

At a time of extraordin­ary swings on world markets, many traders who work in out-of-town offices or in unfamiliar dealing rooms fear that communicat­ion problems and technical glitches risk adding to already spiralling volatility.

At a time of extraordin­ary swings on world markets, many traders working in outof-town offices or in unfamiliar dealing rooms fear that communicat­ion problems and technical glitches risk adding to already spiralling volatility.

Banks’ contingenc­y plans to safeguard markets and employees through the coronaviru­s pandemic could, over time, transform the trading and investment world, with more staff working from home or in smaller centres rather than concentrat­ed in expensive locations such as London’s Canary Wharf or Manhattan in New York.

For now, though, such “business continuity plans” are proving frustratin­g for those forced to commute to New Jersey or the London suburb of Northolt, and scary given the potential for disruption­s caused by telephone or internet outages.

Banks dismiss these fears: many say all systems have been replicated across locations, with staff linked by open phone lines and loudspeake­r systems. For nontrading employees who can work from home, they have stumped up with recorded phone lines, faster servers and additional screens.

Yet, for the head of cash equities at a European bank in Hong Kong, unfamiliar offices and equipment carry stresses that only add to what they see on their monitors.

“You not only get nightmares of a fat-finger error by you or one of your team members, but a slew of other things, including cyber hacks or a trade not going through due to some error at the back-end operations,” he said.

“Our risk and tech guys have been spending sleepless nights to ensure none of those events take place.”

While trading volumes are holding up well, there are some alarming signs — above all, the occasional struggle to execute orders in the $17-trillion US Treasuries market.

There are also episodes such as last Monday’s Australian dollar “mini flash crash”, when bidask spreads briefly widened nearly eightfold, suddenly pushing the exchange rate below $0.63 from $0.655.

On the same day, option trading on Wall Street’s VIX volatility index seized up for several minutes at the open as market-makers failed to come through with prices.

It is not clear whether remote working caused these episodes but it probably has not helped; JPMorgan notes there is no precedent for the sheer scale of market-making that traders split into different locations.

Cyber hacking, higher transactio­n costs, poorer liquidity and greater volatility are the sort of “operationa­l risk event” that could ensue, it warned.

JPMorgan noted for instance that about two-thirds of the volume in longer-maturity US treasuries were transacted at a higher spread last week than during past sell-offs. Market depth was also affected, it said, citing the average size of the top three bids and offers.

It said that on March 9, 60% of trades in 30-year US treasuries had been executed at a bid/offer gap of more than 0.5 ticks, vs almost none at the end of February.

At Dutch bank ING, which has split up teams around the world, executives acknowledg­e changed working conditions, with some monitoring fewer screens, for instance. But the main focus is on managing existing risk rather than providing liquidity, says Obbe Kok, ING’s head of financial markets in the UK.

“We haven’t experience­d exactly this before so we expect there will be an impact for liquidity but we don’t know exactly how much,” Kok said.

The US Federal Reserve and other central banks have moved repeatedly, including at the weekend, to ensure liquidity is not a problem, slashing interest rates and pledging billions of dollars in asset purchases.

One Group of Seven (G7) central bank official said traders, unable to gather in familiar offices to test strategies, are possibly more wary of executing complex trades, causing some sectors to start “gumming up”.

“There was much less trading and there were big difference­s between the buyers and sellers,” he said. Central bank moves would help markets “un-gum”.

Trading has evolved since the 2008 crisis, with machinerea­ding algorithms replacing many of the traders who got deals done by barking orders into phones or punching numbers into electronic platforms.

The bank-to-bank treasury market is dominated by automated, high-frequency traders (HFTs) who work in small sizes but often using preprogram­med algorithms.

But what has not been tested is these machines’ ability to function for any length of time without backup from traders, risk managers and operationa­l staff who ensure smooth settlement of deals.

However, past incidents show that when volatility spikes, HFTs can turn skittish. Splitworki­ng, which erodes humans’ ability to intervene quickly could worsen this, JPMorgan noted.

“If that occurs, we believe this particular circuit breaker will not function effectivel­y, which could significan­tly extend the vicious cycle of higher volatility begetting lower liquidity,” JPMorgan warned.

Meanwhile, investors are noticing the difference. Ross Hutchison, a fund manager at Aberdeen Standard Investment­s, said that contingenc­y measures are “starting to hamper trading”.

“There are simply less traders available than before the virus started.”

While treasury market seizeups were probably more down to the dash for safe-havens than to remote working, investors note widening bid-offer spreads across all bond markets.

Mike Riddell, head of UK fixed income at Allianz Global Investors, said bid-offer spreads in the UK government bond markets, one of the world’s most traded, were about five times normal levels last Monday.

Trading liquidity on the interest rate futures desk was worse than in 2008, he added.

Others, sent home by their funds, were struggling to work with two screens instead of the normal five or six, which one investment strategist described as “flying blind”.

“My productivi­ty has fallen sharply,” they said.

 ?? /Spencer Platt/ Getty Images/ AFP ?? Expecting the worst: Traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange as US President Donald Trump speaks on TV. Stocks again fell sharply despite a drop in interest rates as the US grapples with coronaviru­s.
/Spencer Platt/ Getty Images/ AFP Expecting the worst: Traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange as US President Donald Trump speaks on TV. Stocks again fell sharply despite a drop in interest rates as the US grapples with coronaviru­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa