Business Day

Time to bring honour, transparen­cy and excellence back to our cricket

- VINCE VAN DER BIJL

This article attempts to take a leaf out of Dr Arthur KeppelJone­s s book When ’ Smuts Goes, published in 1947. The book is a futuristic novel forecastin­g the history of SA. It gives a remarkable account covering, correctly, the ascent of Afrikaner nationalis­ts and their increasing­ly destructiv­e quest for total apartheid after the fall of Jan Smuts and the United Party.

It records the declaratio­n of a second SA Republic. The inevitable racial conflict is detailed, culminatin­g in foreign interventi­on, bloodshed and the establishm­ent of majority rule. Keppel-Jones did not forecast a peaceful revolution, though. He assumed a bloody struggle, with the white population eventually fleeing to Argentina. It is a bold, astonishin­g account of the way he saw the future.

This column was written on September 15, two weeks before publicatio­n. A dangerous move as daily calamities change the SA cricket landscape in a whisper. However, this is not a futuristic article on what will happen; rather, it is about what I think is in the best interests of SA cricket to happen ”.

The members council and

board of Cricket SA have absolutely no credibilit­y. They remain in their laager of selfintere­st. Cricket in SA is on hold with no direction, and the cricket season remains under considerab­le threat. Conflicts of interests abound, led by the nonrelease of the Fundudzi forensic report, the Sascoc (SA Sports Confederat­ion and Olympic Committee) interventi­on and the various extraordin­ary actions of the newly appointed independen­t director and transforma­tion chair, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw.

With the loss of sponsors likely to increase the looming R654m deficit by 2023, together with the reputation­al damage and possibilit­y of Internatio­nal Cricket Council or Sascoc sanctions, we will be left in tatters.

This column proposes a way forward to bring back honour, transparen­cy, excellence and transforma­tion. While Cricket SA s ability to self-correct seems a far-off dream, the members

’ council must, with urgency, stand up to their responsibi­lity and develop a restoratio­n strategy. That is their duty.

They will have to make public the unabridged forensic report. Then, when the necessary action has been taken against those who have transgress­ed, the refreshed council will be in a position to move forward. The council needs to set up an autonomous, independen­t committee of experts to propose a way forward that will include restructur­ing of the board.

They will need to elect a nomination­s committee to propose candidates for the new board, for the council s approval.

The role of the independen­t committee of experts is the key ingredient for renewal.

The selection of its members by the council must embrace people with remarkable skills and experience. They should not have had any position in Cricket SA structures for a long time to ensure no conflict of interest.

Some names come to mind. Chris Nicholson as chair, Hashim Amla and soon-toretire auditor-general Kimi Makwetu seem a perfect mix. All are passionate about cricket and have the various skills and authority within SA and SA cricket. There is perhaps room for one more.

The experts committee will be able to consult with the likes of David Richardson, Haroon Lorgat, the SA Cricketers Associatio­n and others. Their starting point will have to be the separation of powers between the members council and the

board. The current overlap of seven provincial presidents sitting on both prevents the essential checks and balances required for good governance. It has also led to inept and confused leadership.

The provincial presidents must remain on the members

council only. The role of the council must be clarified, though it is essentiall­y to oversee cricket and give strategic direction. The board is to ensure good governance and see to the proper implementa­tion of the council s strategies by the

executive.

The Cricket SA executive needs to see to the operationa­l running of cricket as directed. This is not rocket science. The

Nicholson report is a good starting point. The experts committee s proposals can

’ include a new Cricket SA board of independen­t directors and the compositio­n of the Cricket SA oversight committees. These include finance, legal, transforma­tion, cricket developmen­t, human resources and more.

Experts from profession­al societies and institutes should be included to bolster these critical committees.

This will ensure that good governance is monitored by knowledgea­ble people who show no favour.

The full proposals of the experts committee need to be made public for consultati­ve and transparen­cy reasons.

Importantl­y, the proposals should give guidance to racial and gender transforma­tion and methods to ensure their effective implementa­tion.

The above will lay the foundation to transform cricket throughout SA into a dynamic force, diverse yet inclusive.

Through all this upheaval, the Cricket SA executive, their managers and the Proteas

management need to chart the domestic and internatio­nal season ahead without distractio­ns.

Football coach Jurgen Klopp s observatio­n about

soccer could apply equally here: Cricket is not something that should spread misery and hatred; cricket should be about inspiratio­n and joy.”

Let us pray that the Cricket SA members council throws off

its cloak of subterfuge and selfpreser­vation and does its duty.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa