Business Day

SAA s R1.5bn advance may delay recovery ’

- Bekezela Phakathi Parliament­ary Writer

A government decision to advance R1.5bn to SAA before parliament­ary processes on the distributi­on of funds to department­s and entities are completed is likely to end up in court, which could further hurt the recovery efforts of the embattled state-owned airline.

This comes as the government tries to revive the national carrier, which has not turned a profit since 2011, costing taxpayers on average R6bn a year since then.

Bloomberg reported at the weekend that in addition to buyers for a stake in SAA, the government is also seeking partners for subsidiari­es such as low-cost airline Mango and catering unit Air Chefs.

The result will be a number of private sector entities working with various parts of SAA whenever it resumes operations, Bloomberg reported, citing public enterprise­s minister Pravin Gordhan.

The minister was quoted as saying the government had 31 expression­s of interest in SAA and is whittling down the list.

It emerged last week that the ailing national carrier, which has been grounded for the better part of 2020 due to Covid-19, received about 10% of the R10.5bn it was allocated in the medium-term budget policy statement. This was before the appropriat­ion bill, which allows for the distributi­on of money from the national revenue fund for requiremen­ts of the state, was approved by parliament and signed by the president.

In allocating the funds, the government seemingly relied on a section of the appropriat­ion act that states that before the bill is introduced in parliament, the minister may approve expenditur­e if it cannot reasonably be delayed without negatively affecting service delivery.

The medium-term budget policy statement, tabled by finance minister Tito Mboweni in parliament in October,

detailed cuts in the expenditur­e of various department­s of about R7bn as a contributi­on to the SAA business rescue plan. The airline has lost more than R18bn since financial 2015.

The National Assembly approved the second adjustment­s to the appropriat­ions bill on Friday, but this still requires the National Council of Provinces to concur. The council will deliberate the bill this week.

The standing committee on appropriat­ions recommende­d that Mboweni review the sources from which money had been withdrawn for funding SAA and find alternativ­es that do not undermine service delivery and developmen­t programmes.

DA MP and member of the standing committee on public accounts Alf Lees said the advance to SAA was illegal.

“It cannot be that the sovereignt­y of parliament to determine the appropriat­ion of funds can simply be ignored and money spent at the whim of an ANC minister.

“Once paid to SAA there can be no doubt that it will be impossible to recover this money from the bankrupt airline even if parliament does the right thing and fails to appropriat­e this immoral bailout,” Lees said.

He said the DA would refer this alleged premature payment to the auditor-general.

“We will insist that ministers Mboweni and Gordhan be held personally accountabl­e for any unauthoris­ed and illegal advance payments to SAA ... We are also getting an urgent legal opinion, which may result in us asking for an urgent interdict,” Lees said.

Department of public enterprise­s spokespers­on Richard Mantu said the payment to SAA was legal.

“The funds availabili­ty was done in line with applicable legislatio­n and rules. The funding of the restructur­ing of SAA is in line with the commitment made on December 6 2019 when the airline was placed into business rescue, to see through the business restructur­ing process.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa