Spark of life at dawdling M&S
Arising tide lifts all boats — even the good ship M&S. British retailer Marks & Spencer has been a perennial disappointment to investors. But on Friday the household name said its underlying pretax profit would be above the upper end of its previous range of £300m£350m in 2021. The share price rose as much as 14%.
Yet M&S was in turnaround mode for much of the past 20 years. Investors want to see sustained improvement to be convinced this recent bit of good fortune is not another false start.
The company best known for its Percy Pig sweets, prepared meals and underwear said that changes implemented by chair and retail veteran Archie Norman are starting to bear fruit. But Brits flush with lockdown savings and the demise of rivals are having an impact too. Norman revitalised supermarket Asda in the 1990s. His biggest move at M&S was buying 50% of Ocado’s UK retail arm for £750m. Because online food sales are reported through Ocado Retail, they are not reflected in M&S’s trading performance. Instead M&S gets a share of the joint venture’s taxed profit.
Selling M&S food via Ocado does seem to have benefited the broader business. More people have been introduced to the brand thanks to the online supermarket. M&S has also increased its product range products and introduced cheaper items to complement its historic focus on food for special occasions.
M&S cut its clothing range but stocked more of its best sellers such as dresses and jeans, which have been trending recently. It also broke its tradition of selling only privatelabel clothing and now stocks third-party brands, such as environmentally friendly label Nobody’s Child, attracting new customers to the website. About 14% of people who shop at Nobody’s Child are new to M&S womenswear. It introduced athleisure brand Goodmove just before the pandemic. Add in fewer markdowns, and fullprice sales are up 9% on two years ago.
M&S was helped by factors outside its control: Brits are flush with lockdown savings, and many are still not going abroad for their holidays or to restaurants. These trends are good for M&S food business, still suited to preparing a fancy meal at home. Considering that rivals, such as UK department store Debenhams and fashion chain Topshop, disappeared from high streets, it would be more surprising if M&S were not firing on all cylinders.
But it is worth remembering that Next, a much more consistent performer than M&S, last month increased its fullyear pretax“profit forecast after sales were materially ahead” of expectations. So M&S’s brighter outlook is merely a part of the pack, not ahead of it.
The real test for M&S will be what happens if consumer conditions cool. UK retail sales fell 2.5% in July compared with June. Economists had expected a 0.2% increase.
Despite M&S’s efforts to make its food more affordable, if its customers’ incomes are crimped by a higher cost of living, they could trade down to cheaper supermarkets.
And while M&S has made operational improvements, there is more work to do in finding better store locations and sprucing them up. Despite several past CEOs investing billions in its stores, many still look dated. It’s telling that while online sales of clothing and home furnishings in the 19
weeks to August 14 were up 62% from two years ago, store sales were still down almost 20%. There is now a lot of interest in taking over British retailers. A bidder might be tempted to finish what Norman started. But M&S would be a complicated purchase, in part because it sells clothing as well as food, a split that could deliver value but also make the operations more complex. Meanwhile, M&S owns less of its property than the supermarkets. Only 40% is freehold or subject to long leases, partly because some buildings are pledged to the pension fund.
So there is less scope for a new owner to sell off M&S’s property or borrow against it.
Norman has little choice but to prove that M&S won’t sail into choppy waters once the post-pandemic consumer boost fades.