Business Day

Thoughtcri­me in Uganda coupled with the bigotry of SA’s home affairs

Ramaphosa should call out Museveni’s intoleranc­e and publicly open our doors to LGTBQ asylum seekers

- Tristen Taylor ● Dr Taylor, a freelance journalist and photograph­er, is a research fellow in environmen­tal ethics at Stellenbos­ch University.

The Ugandan parliament passed a new anti-LGBTQ bill on March 21 that includes life imprisonme­nt and the death penalty for “acts contrary to nature”. To justify the vote for executions, the parliament­arians used the old bugbear of family values, selective biblical readings, self-declared African traditions and the haunting spectre of roving bands of homosexual­s predating on all and sundry.

Not only does the 2023 Anti-Homosexual­ity Bill increase the penalties for same-gender sex, it also criminalis­es any attempt to have homosexual sex, and the bar is pretty low in terms of what qualifies. Touching another person’s arm the “wrong” way is enough.

But harshly punishing both the deed and the attempt was not enough for these parliament­arians. They decided to introduce Orwellian throughtcr­ime. The bill states that anyone who “holds out as a lesbian, gay, transgende­r, a queer, or any other sexual or gender identity that is contrary to the binary categories of male and female” should be sent to prison for 10 years.

Apparently, simply saying “I am gay” is enough to rent asunder the fundamenta­ls of nature and cause Ugandan society to be consumed in a fiery apocalypse of sin.

President Yoweri Museveni still has to sign the bill before it becomes law, but don’t hold your breath for an outcome that does not involve rounding up gays like the Nazis did.

Museveni has a penchant for fixing elections, arresting journalist­s and muzzling the opposition. His commitment to human rights is as strong as his desire to attend a pride parade.

Museveni believes homosexual­s are disgusting, that gay oral sex gives you worms, and that no-one is gay by nature. You have to be, in his “scientific” view, taught to be queer. According to him, “homosexual­s are actually mercenarie­s. They are heterosexu­al people but because of money they say they are homosexual­s. These are prostitute­s because of money.”

When criticised about Uganda’s approach to homosexual­ity, many Ugandan politician­s fall back on a “don’t you degenerate Europeans tell us what to do” style of argument.

During the debate on the bill, trade minister and bigot David Bahati said: “This is about the sovereignt­y of our nation; nobody should blackmail us, nobody should intimidate us.”

There is the temptation to chuckle. Like many of the other 32 African countries with anti-LGBTQ legislatio­n, Uganda’s law is merely an update of colonial-era legislatio­n.

The Ugandan 1950 penal code states that “Any person who (a) has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature; or (b) has carnal knowledge of an animal; or (c) permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature, commits an offence and is liable to imprisonme­nt for life.”

But while the irony might appeal to a dark sense of humour, something very important is being obscured.

Appeals to African culture and tradition are often used to defend anti-LGBTQ legislatio­n. In effect, the people who hate gays are defining not only what African culture is but also what it should be. Thankfully, Africa is not a country and there are difference­s of opinion.

In a 2019 high court ruling that decriminal­ised homosexual­ity in Botswana, judge Michael Leburu described the colonial laws as belonging “in the museum or archives and not in the world”. He went on to say — contrary to Museveni’s quasiNazi fake science — that “sexual orientatio­n is not a fashion statement. It is an important attribute of one’s personalit­y.”

Twenty-two African countries do not have anti-LGBTQ legislatio­n, including all the former Portuguese colonies. While discrimina­tion against LGBTQ people does exist in these 22 countries, as it regrettabl­y does in every society on the planet, these countries are on the right side of the forces of history.

The concept that LGBTQ people are not to be killed, thrown into jail and repressed is now part of common human thought.

Ideas such as freedom and equal rights may ebb and flow in practice, but once first expressed they do not disappear easily.

The problem is that Museveni and the SA home affairs department have not quite managed to grasp that the world has changed.

SA’s approach to LGBTQ rights has generally been calm and collected. We were the fifth country to legalise gay marriage — the 2006 vote in parliament was 229 for and 41 against. Apart from one abstention, all of the ANC voted for the bill, while 54% of the DA voted against.

Back then, even the liberal West that Museveni rages against had not progressed as far as we had. The so-called bastions of liberalism — Sweden and Norway — legalised it only in 2009. Britain, the former colonial power of Uganda and Botswana, managed to make it legal across the entire UK only in 2020.

At least in urban areas, South Africans appear to support gay marriage.

A 2021 Ipsos online opinion poll showed that 59% of people support legal same-sex marriage and only 15% are opposed; 12% think same-sex couples should be able to obtain some alternativ­e legal recognitio­n.

Moreover, 69% think LGBTQ couples should be able to adopt children. These numbers are almost exactly the same as those in the US.

Yet home affairs is completely out of step. Over and over again, researcher­s show that immigratio­n authoritie­s routinely deny and frustrate refugee status for LGTBQ people fleeing oppression, including from Uganda.

A Heinrich Böll Foundation study in 2018 concluded that just 4% of LGBTQ refugees were granted asylum status. Home affairs is, like Uganda, on the wrong side of history. The protection of LGBTQ rights and the abolition of the death penalty are among the governing ANC’s greatest achievemen­ts. The party has stuffed up so much else, but on these matters it stood tall. As an African president and the leader of the ANC, Cyril Ramaphosa has only one real path to take.

The president should not only call out Museveni’s disgusting intoleranc­e but also publicly open our doors to LGTBQ asylum seekers. This is Ramaphosa’s opportunit­y to show moral courage and defend progressiv­e African values.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa