Cape Argus

The RDP houses for sale scandal

Dwellings subsidised by state are sold illegally online

- Anél Lewis METRO WRITER anel.lewis@inl.co.za

SUBSIDY houses, formerly known as RDP houses, are being sold illegally for cash on classified sites such as OLX or Gumtree, leaving the beneficiar­ies to return to informal settlement­s or the street. Often the properties are sold below market value with no guarantee that the buyers will get the title deed they need to be the legal owners.

While formal statistics are scant, the Western Cape’s human settlement­s department says the illegal sale of RDP housing is widespread, and difficult to prevent.

In Dunoon, for example, only four out of 10 RDP houses are occupied by the original beneficiar­ies.

The national Department of Human Settlement­s said it was illegal for the recipient of an RDP house, now known as a Breaking New Ground house, to sell it before having lived in the structure for at least eight years.

“We are of the view that RDP houses must never be sold,” said ministeria­l spokesman Ndivhuwo Mabaya. “They must be improved and handed over from generation to generation. Our research is that these houses are sold to satisfy short-term interest and for financial relief. This is a problem, as the (seller) either returns to informal settlement­s or becomes a street citizen.”

During the eight years the beneficiar­y may only sell the property back to the provincial human settlement­s department.

Most of the time the house is sold at a price that covers the debt owed, not a price that reflects the full value of the property.

The national department said subsequent buyers usually would not qualify for state housing subsidies.

Mabaya said many of the property sales were illegal, with the sellers returning to informal settlement­s to “instigate protests and violence at times against the people they have sold houses to”.

They were being sold to “anyone who has money”.

The Cape Argus contacted someone who was advertisin­g several RDP properties on OLX. In WhatsApp correspond­ence about the advertised property, he insisted the transactio­n had to be cash only. Subsidies would not be accepted.

A quick search on other online classified websites showed he was selling several properties, ranging from R100 000 to almost R200 000. In some cases he specified that the houses were more than 10 years old.

Bonginkosi Madikizela, Western Cape

MEC for Human Settlement­s, said the resale of subsidy houses was almost impossible to prevent.

“We can have as many laws as we want but this is difficult to prevent. We are giving houses to people who have nothing to put on the table. A house is not a substitute for a job. That is why people end up selling or renting their house.”

Madikizela said the eight-year restrictio­n, or pre-emptive clause, was forcing people to sell their houses illegally or informally. This often meant the new buyers would not get title deeds or proper transfer of the property. Sales on the informal market were “impossible to police”.

In response to a parliament­ary question last August, Human Settlement­s Minister Lindiwe Sisulu said there were no protocols to track the unlawful sale of subsidised houses. However, there was a record of cases reported to the respective provincial housing department­s where the eightyear restrictio­n had been waived.

Sisulu said the Western Cape government waived the eight-year pre-emptive right for 151 houses in the 2011-12 financial year, allowing the house to be sold after the beneficiar­y had lived there for two years.

In 2012-13, 389 houses were sold after only two years – 112 in the Eastern Cape, two in Limpopo and 275 in the Western Cape. The number increased to 2 852 in 2013-14, with most in the Eastern Cape. The Western Cape allowed for the sale of 154 houses after two years during this period.

Sisulu said the Eastern Cape provincial housing department reported the illegal sale of 112 houses in 2012, and 2 697 the following year.

Madikizela said the problem was widespread in the Western Cape. A recent study in Thembaleth­u, George revealed that out of 10 RDP houses, only one occupant was the original beneficiar­y. A study in Dunoon revealed only 40 percent of the RDP tenants were the original beneficiar­ies.

Many of the houses were being used as spaza shops.

Sisulu said in August last year the national department would conduct an occupancy audit of government houses.

“We have started auditing our waiting list in order to create the demand database to strengthen our allocation policies, to ensure that those who have benefited do not move to another municipali­ty and benefit again,” said Mabaya.

An education campaign is to be launched next month, cautioning beneficiar­ies about the risks of selling their houses.

Mayoral committee member for human settlement­s Benedicta Van Minnen said the city dedicated “significan­t resources” to educating beneficiar­ies in financial management, basic legal advice, general home maintenanc­e and repairs, and establishi­ng food gardens to increase food security.

 ??  ??
 ?? PICTURES: BHEKI RADEBE ?? WEB OF DECEIT: One of the RDP houses being sold by a property developer in Kuils River.
PICTURES: BHEKI RADEBE WEB OF DECEIT: One of the RDP houses being sold by a property developer in Kuils River.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa