Right call to axe Molefe

BRIAN Molefe may well be everything his supporters claim him to be: an extraordinarily talented corporate leader, the Eskom chief executive who kept the lights of South Africa burning in troubled times, and the head of a state-owned enterprise who was worth every cent of the many millions of rand he was paid.

In defending the R30 million payout Molefe may or may not get, their argument is probably true, too, that South Africa is used to the concept of the golden handshake.

Yes, Coleman Andrews, the former boss of SAA, was paid R232m when he left the national carrier after two years at the helm.

And yes, it is true that Dali Mpofu, now of the EFF, is said to have walked off with roughly R14m when he was persuaded to leave the SABC. These are just two examples. We know it will be argued all these salaries and bonuses are market-related.

But in Molefe’s case there was something else, something highly problematic that should have – and eventually did – rule him out of a second bite at Eskom’s top job.

HE WAS named as a key player in former public protector Thuli Madonsela’s “State of Capture” report, as someone too close to a uniquely South African term for state capture: the Guptas.

Shortly after the report went public, Molefe quit Eskom in tears, even as he maintained his innocence.

There was outrage when he was sworn in as an MP soon afterwards, amid rumours he was President Jacob Zuma’s first choice to be the next finance minister, if as was widely expected, Pravin Gordhan would be sacked.

There was even more disbelief and anger when news of a R30m pay-out for his 18 months’ work at Eskom became known, followed by confirmation of his return for a “you pay your money, you take your pick” reason.

This week, an inter-ministerial committee, chaired by Justice Minister Michael Masutha, reversed Molefe’s appointment.

It is sad that the career at Eskom of such a talented person should have been brought to such an end – in such a way.

But it was the right thing to do.