Cape Argus

Province being held to ransom by gangsteris­m

Critical rethink on strategies to tackle scourge needed to protect vulnerable

- Bernard Joseph Bernard Joseph is the Western Cape chairperso­n of the EFF.

GIVEN the historical and political nature of gang violence and gangsteris­m in general in the Western Cape, debates should not only be on service delivery but rather on its negative impact on the socio-economic developmen­t on disadvanta­ged communitie­s, particular­ly coloured and black areas.

A high rate of gang violence can have many adverse repercussi­ons, such as a negative impact on the investment climate which can deter or delay developmen­t and growth in disadvanta­ged communitie­s. It can lead to higher costs of doing business, such as the need to employ different forms of security. This in turn diverts investment away from business expansion and productivi­ty improvemen­t and may lead to a less than optimal operating strategy.

Other negative impacts include business losses arising from looting, arson, theft, extortion and fraud. The loss of output due to reduced hours of operation, loss of workdays arising from outbreaks of violence as well as an avoidance of some types of economic activities have devastatin­g effects on the investment climate. The loss of output is also visible on a temporary (injury) or permanent (murder) level in the labour force.

Gang violence further erodes the developmen­t of human capital as well as social capital, which in turn constrains the potential for growth. Gangsteris­m reduces the quality of life of those affected. Violent crimes in general, force otherwise productive individual­s to occasional­ly exit the labour force because of violent injury to themselves or close associates, or because of social unrest in the community. Violence also causes schools to close periodical­ly. Moreover, home and community instabilit­y is not conducive to learning and educationa­l objectives.

It diverts public resources excessivel­y away from productive uses that have a potentiall­y much higher impact on social developmen­t and growth to areas such as police, justice, the medical system (for treatment of violence-related injuries and trauma).

Gang violence and gangsteris­m is a product of colonialis­m and apartheid and it continues to deepen its roots because of a broad ineffectiv­e and a “colonial-centric administra­tive” approach to service delivery. The outcome is distortion­s such as continuous discrimina­tion to services rendered, chronic unemployme­nt and high levels of inequality as seen in the Western Cape.

What needs to be discussed is not only the impact of gang violence on service delivery, but also the impact and the effectiven­ess of both provincial and local government department­s in rendering a quality of service to vulnerable communitie­s. What is required is an urgent response to where there is a dire need as well as how service delivery ensures that communitie­s are places of safety, better health services and better education facilities.

Discussing the impact of gang violence should translate into action and the deliveranc­e of proper services to coloured and black communitie­s. The EFF is committed to implementi­ng provincial government programmes to reduce gangsteris­m and increase safety. The issue is a matter of urgency and should be discussed across different sectors that are inclusive of government, NGOs, and youth-led institutio­ns such as the Chrysalis Academy, as well as previous safety initiative­s created and funded by the Department of Community Safety. Initiative­s such as these need to be interrogat­ed to understand their impact and how they benefited the people affected.

Discussion­s need to focus on whether or not safety initiative­s should be reviewed and/or enhanced to better serve the communitie­s.

Initiative­s such as the Nyanga Yethu (a youth crime prevention initiative by locals) were once seen as potential vehicles to address the scourge. However, the initiative was ended.

The current gang-infested landscape grips communitie­s as well as holds people hostage in a way that affects not only their safety but health and general well-being.

Surely it is time to review current safety initiative­s and question the discontinu­ation and absence of safety initiative­s?

Gang violence is not a new issue. Instead of recycling old discussion­s, provincial and local government­s must translate lip service into action.

Current initiative­s such as the EPP programme, community policing forums, Bambanani School Safety project need to be examined with a view to revise or recreate them in a way that makes the needs of the vulnerable a priority with clear and well-planned programmes that will begin to tackle an issue that is often not prioritise­d.

These are the real issues politician­s should be addressing to find better ways to structure programmes, not only to make communitie­s safe but to address issues of inequality and unemployme­nt – elements black and coloured communitie­s struggle with on an hourly basis.

There is a need to create and implement initiative­s that are cognisant of this. Sustainabi­lity must be at the forefront of projects and programmes as well as offering youth educationa­l and skills-developmen­t alternativ­es.

Current youth training academies were instituted as a response to youth developmen­t as well as to address the scourge of gang violence in communitie­s, yet escalating levels of gang violence tell a different story.

While the government (Department of Community Safety, provincial Treasury) funds are ploughed into many youth-focused skills programmes and academies aimed at strengthen­ing safety in some communitie­s, youth and communitie­s remain targets and vulnerable to violence.

An approach that is nuanced and cognisant of the complex social and economic elements many black and coloured communitie­s are faced with is urgently required. Initiative­s and programmes can no longer offer superficia­l change, it needs to offer communitie­s real change that reduces inequality, improves education as well as ensures effective and fair law enforcemen­t.

These are the value-add discussion­s all levels of government­s should prioritise.

GANG VIOLENCE IS NOT A NEW ISSUE. INSTEAD OF RECYCLING OLD DISCUSSION­S, IT’S TIME THE GOVERNMENT TRANSLATED THE LIP SERVICE INTO ACTION

 ?? PICTURE: ARMAND HOUGH ?? TURF BATTLE: Members of the dominant rival gangs in Manenberg discuss a ceasefire in 2015. The author argues that a more comprehens­ive approach was needed if we are to win the war against gangs.
PICTURE: ARMAND HOUGH TURF BATTLE: Members of the dominant rival gangs in Manenberg discuss a ceasefire in 2015. The author argues that a more comprehens­ive approach was needed if we are to win the war against gangs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa