Cape Argus

Google has you trapped

-

GOOGLE’S sweeping capability to collect data makes it nearly impossible to escape the tech giant in the course of normal online activity, according to a new study .

The 55-page study published this week and led by Vanderbilt University professor, Douglas Schmidt, said an idle smartphone running Google’s Android operating system with its Chrome browser open sends data communicat­ions to Google’s servers as often as 14 times an hour.

While not using Google’s devices or services limits data collection, the dominance of its advertisin­g network makes it difficult to prevent Google from collecting some data, the study highlights.

The study provides a broad look at the aspects of Google’s techniques for collecting data, both through Maps, Hangouts chat and YouTube as well as through its DoubleClic­k Ad Network.

It was paid for by Digital Content Next, a lobbying group that represents the digital publishing industry and a frequent critic of Google.

The group has previously criticised Google for its lack of moderation on YouTube as well as the company’s dominance, with Facebook, of the online advertisin­g industry.

“These products are able to collect user data through a variety of techniques that may not be easily graspable by a general user,” Schmidt wrote.

“A major part of Google’s data collection occurs while a user is not directly engaged with any of its products.” Google questioned the study’s credibilit­y. “This report is commission­ed by a profession­al DC lobbyist group, and written by a witness for Oracle in their ongoing copyright litigation with Google. So, it’s no surprise that it contains wildly misleading informatio­n,” the company said.

The report comes as Google faces increased scrutiny over how it collects location informatio­n, following an AP investigat­ion that revealed turning off the “location history” setting did not stop all location data collection. Two men in California filed lawsuits after the report, Ars Technica reported, alleging that Google had misled them about the extent of its tracking.

Schmidt found two-thirds of the data Google collected from a smartphone during a 24-hour mock “day in the life” period was through passive means, meaning it was not volunteere­d by a person. He also found evidence that Google had the capability to link anonymised data with informatio­n from people’s Google accounts while they are signed out from their Google accounts or using a private browsing mode – called “incognito mode” – on Google’s Chrome browser. The study also claims Google can link anonymised data collected by advertisin­g cookies to people’s Google accounts.

Google makes the bulk of its money from advertisin­g, which accounted for 86% of its revenue in its second-quarter earnings report.

When asked for specific points that are misleading, Google directed media to its descriptio­ns of how incognito mode and the Chrome browser record and track informatio­n, saying it does not link anonymous activity with people’s Google accounts once they sign in. In the case of private browsing, informatio­n is deleted when someone turns the mode off. Google also said it did not link anonymised data collected from advertisin­g cookies with users’ accounts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa