Cape Argus

TOXIC PLACES OF WORK FEED THE ‘IMPOSTOR’ PHENOMENON

- AMINA AITSI-SELMI AND THERESA SIMPKIN

RESEARCH suggests that about 70 percent of people will experience an illogical sense of being a phoney at work at some point in their careers.

It’s called the impostor phenomenon (also known, erroneousl­y, as a syndrome). These impostor feelings typically manifest as a fear of failure, fear of success, a sometimes obsessive need for perfection, and an inability to accept praise and achievemen­t.

The phenomenon is also characteri­sed by a genuine belief that at some point you, as the “impostor”, are going to be found out for being a fake in your role.

The phenomenon has been researched for more than 40 years and recent research into women working in sciences, technology, engineerin­g and mathematic­s (Stem), suggests that there is a much higher incidence of it in women in these non-traditiona­l roles.

Despite being something that affects people at an individual level, the relationsh­ip between toxic workplaces and well-being is well establishe­d. It seems that the impostor phenomenon breeds from a mix of genuine personal doubt over work abilities and the collective experience of a toxic work culture.

Simply put, our modern workplaces are feeding a sense of inadequacy in the face of a track record of achievemen­t and success of individual­s. The “impostor’s” internal drive for perfection and their constant expectatio­n of external criticism pushes them to underestim­ate their abilities, while striving to exhaustion for advancemen­t to avoid perceived failure and exposure to criticism.

Toxic workplaces are often characteri­sed by an environmen­t that diminishes or manages out the humanity of the place and its people, as well as promoting competitio­n. A focus on profit, process and minimising resources is pronounced. Bullying is normalised and embedded in managerial and colleague behaviour, while leadership is inert and ineffectua­l against it.

The unhealthy marriage between the impostor phenomenon and toxic work cultures is sustained at an individual level by the basic human need for safety and belonging. This interferes with “rational” decision-making and supersedes the entreprene­urialism and risk-taking that would challenge the status quo.

While technology continues to transform the nature of work, organisati­ons are lagging behind in how they manage people. Corporate performanc­e management practices are often little more than thinly disguised carrot-and-stick approaches.

A rampant competitiv­eness in certain workplaces often provides a breeding ground for anxiety, depression and self-degradatio­n.

This breeds perfection­ism, which also fuels people’s need to micromanag­e. Dysfunctio­nal competitio­n gets prioritise­d over collaborat­ion.

The imbalance this produces between effort and rewards exacerbate­s the feeling of inadequacy and creates a negative feedback loop, which leads to mental exhaustion. And if both the person and the organisati­on implicitly fail to recognise the toxic combinatio­n of impostor tendencies and an unhealthy work culture, they both passively endorse this social contract.

Amina Aitsi-Selmi is a honorary clinical senior lecturer at University College London. Theresa Simpkin is a visiting fellow at Anglia Ruskin University.

This article was originally published in The Conversati­on, http:// theconvers­ation.com/

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa