Cape Argus

‘Electoral Act is undemocrat­ic’

Ruling reserved on rights of citizens to independen­tly contest elections

- SIVIWE FEKETHA siviwe.feketha@inl.co.za | COURTNEY AFRICA

THE battle over rights of individual­s who wish to contest for political office outside a political party in provincial and national elections landed at the Constituti­onal Court yesterday.

The applicatio­n was led by New Nation Movement and the Indigenous First Nation Advocacy South Africa as they argued that the Electoral Act was unconstitu­tional for barring people from standing for public office without joining political parties.

Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitob­i said the Electoral Act infringed the rights enshrined in section 19 of the Constituti­on, which allows people to vote and stand for public office limits citizens in exercising their rights, compelling them to do so only through being a member of a political party.

“The Electoral Act makes absolutely no provision for every citizen to exercise their political choices in a mode other than a political party and that restrictio­n is neither justified nor reasonable in a democratic and open society,” Ngcukaitob­i said.

He said it was also against internatio­nal law to oblige citizens to be members of parties in order to participat­e in the political life of the nation.

Ngcukaitob­i painstakin­gly pointed out that by allowing individual citizens to contest elections independen­tly, it would encourage accountabi­lity because public representa­tives who belong to political parties tend to be accountabl­e to their respective organisati­ons rather than to citizens.

“This has already been said by this court in the secret ballot case in the context of whether or not party representa­tives are bound to vote according to conscience or according to party dictates. The court spoke lavishly about the implicatio­ns of a party system for accountabi­lity,” Ngcukaitob­i said.

The applicants argued that as they envisaged putting their Khoisan traditiona­l leader up for public office, it forced her to join or form a party which would make her partisan and was wrong for traditiona­l leaders.

Advocate Steven Budlender, for the IEC, said those who did not want to be political had to recuse themselves from political offices.

“You cannot be elected to political office and not push a political agenda. I could understand the position that says she does not run for Parliament or the position that she will not join the ANC or the DA, but you can’t have a position that says I am non-political and I want to run for Parliament. That is inconsiste­nt. She must make her decision,” Budlender said.

Budlender further stated that the party system did not limit the rights of citizens.

“There can be an infinite number of political parties, 48 in the last election. The right to vote is the right to choose between those political parties and if you find one you like you vote for it and if you cannot find the one you like you spoil your ballot or form you own party,” he said.

Budlender said the purpose of Section 19 was to say that every citizen in this country may run for office, but subject to the system put in place by Parliament,” he said.

Judgment has been reserved.

 ?? African News Agency (ANA) ?? KING Louis Dirks and other Khoi leadership at a Cape Town High Court hearing in March. The Khoi leadership is challengin­g the exclusion of independen­t candidates to stand for elections in the Constituti­onal Court.
African News Agency (ANA) KING Louis Dirks and other Khoi leadership at a Cape Town High Court hearing in March. The Khoi leadership is challengin­g the exclusion of independen­t candidates to stand for elections in the Constituti­onal Court.
 ??  ?? ADVOCATE Tembeka Ngcukaitob­i
ADVOCATE Tembeka Ngcukaitob­i

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa