Cape Argus

A chance of justice for Thomas Sankara

- LEO ZEILIG Zeilig is a senior visiting Fellow at the University of London

EARLIER this month a court in Burkina Faso’s capital indicted former president Blaise Compaoré for his role in the murder of his comrade, Thomas Sankara, on October 15, 1987.

The military court detailed Compaoré’s “complicity in the assassinat­ion”, the first time a court in the country has made such an accusation. Compaoré ruled the country until 2014 when he was forced to flee for neighbouri­ng Cote D’Ivoire during a mass uprising.

The decision to try the former leader has been called a landmark moment. Sankara’s family has pursued justice for almost 34 years but while Compaoré was in power there was no possibilit­y of bringing his murderers to justice.

The political history of Burkina Faso is one I have studied and written about extensivel­y, with a particular focus on the circumstan­ces leading to

Sankara’s assassinat­ion. It is important to unravel this event and its significan­ce if a trial of Compaoré is to be understood (or to take place).

Sankara was the president of Burkina Faso when he was murdered at the age of 37. He was the leader of a bold initiative to transform a country trapped in a dependent relationsh­ip with the rest of the world, particular­ly France.

From the early 1980s, Sankara emerged as a challenger to the cynical class of post-independen­ce leaders. Sankara was a radical army officer who became disgusted by the circulatio­n of a self-serving elite in his country since independen­ce in 1960.

Sankara came to power in a popular coup on August 4, 1984.

The Burkinabé revolution, as it became known, took place at the start of the age of economic austerity on the African continent. This arose from the structural adjustment policies demanded by the World Bank and the IMF, and from cuts to funding for public services.

Economic devastatio­n and the largely unreformed relationsh­ips of African states with former colonial powers formed a pattern which Sankara promised to break. He refused to accept that poverty in West Africa was inevitable, and offered a new kind of freedom.

Developmen­t projects imposed by the West had failed, and he saw the future in securing Upper Volta’s (as the country was known before 1984) separation from the exploitati­ve linkages with France, the former colonial power.

Many of the reforms implemente­d under the brief period of Sankara’s rule were ambitious, and far-sighted. Sankara’s government launched a mass vaccinatio­n programme in an effort to eliminate polio, meningitis and measles.

Compaoré, who had been minister of state at the presidency during Sankara’s

years, quickly denied involvemen­t in Sankara’s murder, claiming he was at home and sick. By the evening of the assassinat­ion, he was the new president. The new regime quickly returned Burkina Faso to its place in the global political-economic hierarchy – with little reaction from all the Burkinabé who had supported Sankara’s transforma­tion ideas. He had tried to substitute his popularity, charisma and oratory for a movement that could confront the forces working towards his defeat.

With the possible arrest and trial of Compaoré for the murder of his comrade there might be a chance for justice. Compaoré delivered Burkina Faso and its great hopes for revolution­ary change back into the hands of internatio­nal power and French influence. For this he was overthrown by a popular insurrecti­on in October 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa