Cape Argus

Former health official probed on removal of Esidimeni patients

- ZINTLE MAHLATI zintle.mahlati@inl.co.za

THE Life Esidimeni inquest has continued to hear evidence linked to the removal of psychiatri­c patients from Life Esidimeni.

The former director-general of clinical services at the Gauteng Department of Health has conceded that he was part of the decision-making process that approved the terminatio­n of the Life Esidimeni group contract.

Dr Richard Lebethe faced crossexami­nation for the third day at the Life Esidimeni inquest yesterday.

The inquest is probing who should be held responsibl­e for the deaths of 144 psychiatri­c patients who died when they were moved to various NGOs. This is after the Gauteng Department of Health had decided to terminate its contract with Life Esidimeni Group.

Lebethe has spent much of his testimony distancing himself from the decision-making processes for the project to move more than a thousand patients from Life Esidimeni. He said he was often busy when meetings took place to discuss the patient removal project.

However, statements presented by witnesses have shown he may have played an active role.

Levy Mosenogi, a former health department official, provided an affidavit that places Lebethe in charge of the project.

Mosenogi’s lawyer, advocate Benedict Maphahle, read a letter written by former Gauteng health MEC Qedani Mahlangu in which she urged officials to implement the project.

Lebethe was also shown a statement in which Mosenogi stated that Lebethe was present when the decision to terminate the Life Esidimeni contract was decided. Lebethe conceded that he was part of that decisionma­king meeting.

On Mahlangu’s letter, written in November 2015, Lebethe also conceded that he was “in charge” of the project because he was the head of clinical services. However, he repeated earlier statements that he had been busy, and that mental health officials were in charge while he was busy.

“That may have been the mandate, but people who had specific responsibi­lities in the project were others who did not have broad responsibi­lities in the department. It would have been hard for me to run the project and run other aspects of the department,” Lebethe told the court.

He confirmed that he was present when complaints were made about the process used to move patients.

Mosenogi, who is still to testify, had pleaded with Mahlangu in a meeting to extend the deadline for the Life Esidimeni project for six months or up to a year.

Mosenogi was concerned about moving patients within a short space of time. The patients were sickly and were at risk of relapsing, Mosenogi’s statement said.

Tiisetso Malele for Rebafeng, one of the NGOs where several patients died, told the court that his NGO had been badly represente­d at the inquest.

Lebethe had testified that when health department officials had visited Rebafeng they found the facility had no food. Malele denies this and said the NGO did have food.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa