Cape Argus

Four suspended Satawu office bearers reinstated after ruling

- MWANGI GITHAHU mwangi.githahu@inl.co.za

FOUR Western Cape Satawu office bearers are back at work after having won a case in the Western Cape High Court against their suspension for calling a meeting in September 2021 to address alleged issues of financial mismanagem­ent at the union.

The four are Satawu provincial executive committee (PEC) chairperso­n Lucky Siwani and deputy chairperso­n Sindisiwe Moala, as well as Southern Cape local branch chairperso­n Bonginkosi Lose and branch secretary Simthembil­e Mcithi.

Siwani and Moala were suspended for calling the meeting through a notice which the union argued was defective because it did not provide for the requisite 7-day notice period, as per the Satawu constituti­on, to allow members to properly prepare for such a meeting.

In August, the Weekend Argus reported that the Department of Labour was investigat­ing a string of allegation­s against Satawu’s leaders, who had been accused of using the union’s funds as a personal cash cow.

Lose and Mcithi’s suspension­s came about in October 2021, after they were found to have sent an “improper” letter to all Satawu’s national office bearers.

Western Cape secretary Bongani

Matana said their letter intended to “undermine, subvert and impair the union’s good name, reputation, and esteem among the Satawu community”.

The letter also allegedly discredite­d the union’s top officials, including its president and general secretary Jack Mazibuko.

Matana alerted Mazibuko, who subsequent­ly sent a letter to Siwani and Moala cautioning them from convening the PEC meeting. He acknowledg­ed the grievances, and attempted to provide guidance on how best to resolve the matter.

Siwani and Moala defied Mazibuko and said the meeting was constituti­onally compliant and insisted that they would be proceeding with the meeting as a result of which Mazibuko wrote to them, suspending them.

As for Lose and Mcithi, Matana told them he was suspending them so that the matter could be investigat­ed.

All four had sued the union, Matana and Mazibuko demanding that their suspension­s as Satawu office bearers be declared unconstitu­tional, unlawful and invalid.

They said that Matana’s suspension letters to Lose and Mcithi violated the Satawu constituti­on by not giving them the right to respond.

They also argued that Matana had no legal standing to issue the suspension notices because since the suspension­s of Siwani and Moala, the provincial office bearer committee (POBC) was not properly constitute­d.

They said neither the provincial secretary nor the POBC were empowered by the constituti­on to suspend them.

The court had to decide whether the suspension­s were constituti­onally permissibl­e and thus legal.

With regard to Siwani and Moala, Deputy Judge President Patricia Goliath found that Mazibuko could not act against them because they are provincial office bearers, and thus elected officials.

Judge Goliath ruled that only the union’s central executive committee had the authority to institute disciplina­ry steps against them.

Judge Goliath also said Matana had no authority to discipline and suspend Lose and Mcithi and ordered that all four officials be reinstated and that the union pay the costs of the four.

 ?? ?? Deputy Judge President Patricia Goliath.
Deputy Judge President Patricia Goliath.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa