Gambia sees its first legal transfer of power since independence
AS MILITARY interventions go, it was practically flawless.
Last month, Gambia’s long-ruling dictator, President Yahya Jammeh, lost an election that turned out to be a little freer than he had planned.
After first conceding defeat and even phoning up the victor, property developer Adama Barrow, to congratulate him, Jammeh changed his mind and decided to stay in power.
Within days the Economic Community of West African States (Ecowas) had condemned Jammeh’s action and ordered him to hand over power to Barrow.
Within weeks the organisation was organising a military force to make him do so, while the presidents and prime ministers of other Ecowas countries shuttled back and forth trying to persuade Jammeh to see reason.
Last Thursday, with Jammeh still clinging to power, the UN Security Council passed a resolution supporting Ecowas, but asking it to use “political means first”.
Typically, it did not endorse military action.
It was the usual Security Council compromise, saying the right thing but not demanding decisive action.
So Ecowas went ahead anyway. On Friday a multinational force of 7 000 troops from five West African countries crossed the border from Senegal into Gambia. Barrow, who had fled to Senegal to avoid arrest or worse, was sworn in as president and immediately ordered the Gambian army not to resist. With few exceptions, it didn’t.
Most of Saturday was taken up with a series of missed deadlines for Jammeh to hand over power and leave. However, that evening he boarded a plane and left for Guinea, en route to his permanent place in exile in Equatorial Guinea, a country so isolated and obscure that it makes Gambia seem positively metropolitan.
The likely reason for the delay was revealed on Sunday, when Mai Ahmad Fatty, one of President Barrow’s advisers, reported that $11.3 million (R153m) was missing from the Gambian government’s coffers, which were nearly empty.
Yahya Jammeh did not spend his 22 years in power stealing the country’s money and hiding it abroad like any normal dictator.
As a full-time megalomaniac, he simply didn’t believe he could ever lose power. But when reality finally came crashing in, he quickly understood that maintaining his lifestyle in exile would require lots of money, so he grabbed whatever was available on his way out.
Good riddance – and not a single life was lost in the whole operation. Gambia has seen the first legal transfer of power since its independence in 1965, and Ecowas has once again shown that it is the most effective regional security organisation on the planet.
You will never see the Association of South-East Asian Nations or the Arab League intervening militarily to defend democracy.
The Organisation of American States doesn’t do military interventions at all, and one doubts that the EU would actually resort to force to stop a dictator from coming to power in one of its Balkan members.
The AU does a bit better (the interventions in Somalia and South Sudan), but its huge membership of 54 countries makes decision-making a lengthy and tortuous process, whereas Ecowas’s 15 countries have repeatedly and successfully intervened to defend or restore democratic governments in its member states, most recently in Ivory Coast (2010), Guinea-Bissau (2012), and Mali (2012).
Ecowas was founded in 1975, and its members first committed themselves to respect human rights and to promote democratic systems of government in 1991 (when a number of them were still dictatorships).
But the key year was 1999, when they all signed up to the Protocol relating to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peace-Keeping, and Security (Protocol-Mechanism).
It could be compared to the UN Security Council, in the sense that it has the right to order military interventions in sovereign states to stop wars, but it goes further in two important ways: it can also intervene to thwart unconstitutional attacks on democracy – and there is no veto. Even giant Nigeria, which has half of Ecowas’s total population, has to accept majority decisions.
Decisions to intervene are taken by a two-thirds majority on the Mediation and Security Council, a nine-member body with a rotating membership.
Nigeria obviously has huge influence, which it regularly wields in favour of democracy, but it is sometimes not even sitting on the MSC when it takes its decisions.
The Southern African Development Community and the African Union (with responsibility for the whole continent) have subsequently followed Ecowas’s lead and adopted similar rules for intervention, but this kind of tough international protection for human rights and democracy is non-existent outside Africa.
You could argue, of course, that it’s Africa that needs it most, and you would be right. But the point is (a) that Africa does have it, and (b) that several other regions of the world would benefit from similar institutions.
Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.
Ecowas has again shown it is the most effective regional security organisation on the planet