Cape Times

Girls ends as Dunham’s art peaks

-

NOTHING can quite make up for the political chaos that has swept Washington so far this year.

But as Donald Trump has settled uneasily into his presidency, setting his advisers on each other like a sadistic ringmaster arranging the pairings at a gladiatori­al arena, I’ve found some comfort in TV, where women feel liberated from demands that they be likeable or gorgeous or that they wear skirts in the workplace.

Aubrey Plaza slithered her way through Legion as a scary, sexy parasite. Nicole Kidman, Reese Witherspoo­n, Laura Dern and Shailene Woodley showed us all the different ways the light could glint off their brittle edges in Big Little Lies, a show with a quietly radical, feminist anti-climax.

In a few weeks Silicon Valley will return, and with it, Amanda Crew and Suzanne Cryer’s performanc­es as female investors navigating the crazed, mostly-male jungle of Silicon Valley.

And 2017 has given me fresh appreciati­on for a long-running performanc­e that is coming to a close next weekend: Lena Dunham has always done excellent work as Hannah Horvath, the narcissist­ic, potentiall­y brilliant avatar of herself she plays on her show Girls.

It has sometimes been difficult to see Girls itself through the thicket of analysis that has grown up around the show during its sixyear run.

But as Hannah has become a more settled and serious person, less-prone to cocaine binges in mesh tops and rants that are the equivalent of emotional suicide bombings, Dunham’s acting has become even clearer and more luminous. Just as Girls is about to end, she has put on a year-long clinic in why we ought to miss Hannah Horvath, even if the character often drove us nuts.

I’ve written before about my emotional relationsh­ip with Girls, which became more volatile over time as I felt as though I grew up but the characters did not. I’d start a season, feel absolutely infuriated by the characters’ backslidin­g and self-sabotage, and by the end of the run, find myself totally recommitte­d to the relationsh­ip.

This was never more true than in the fourth season of the show when Hannah managed to blow up not merely her tenure at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop by alienating her fellow students, but also to nearly get herself fired from a promising substitute-teaching job.

But just when I felt as though this was a fictional friendship I could no longer sustain, Girls gave us Home Birth. In that episode, Hannah helps her ex-boyfriend Adam’s (Adam Driver) sister Caroline (Gaby Hoffmann) get to the hospital to deliver her daughter early. She and Adam meet over the baby’s incubator, and Adam tells her – as he does at various moments of insecurity throughout the show – that he wants to get back together with her.

Dunham’s face is already soft and relaxed from speaking to the baby, and as Adam makes this suggestion, her mouth collapses in on itself, folding in at the corners and the lips. When she rejects him, she’s firm but not unkind; her eyes turn down at the corners, and she flushes and tears up but doesn’t lose control.

In a subsequent scene with Fran (Jake Lacy), her new boyfriend, it’s as though Hannah’s face has bloomed again, unfurling from her sad conversati­on with Adam. It’s a transfixin­g, unflashy performanc­e.

The skills Dunham showed off in the fourth-season finale have been in full flower this year, and perhaps it’s not a coincidenc­e that I haven’t travelled my normal wave of emotion about Girls in its final outing.

In the third episode of the season, when Hannah confronted author Chuck Palmer (Matthew Rhys) over a piece she had written about his alleged sexual misconduct, her body language was tighter and firmer than when she refused Adam.

When Hannah did unfurl, the physical comedy of the scene that resulted was surprising and funny.

Two weeks ago, Hannah – who is pregnant – and Adam revisited the same emotional territory of the fourth-season finale when he tracked her down and offered to raise the child with her.

This time, the show relied on Dunham’s face to do more and the script to do less: As they discussed the logistics of such an arrangemen­t over soup at a diner, it became clear that the fantasy they have spun together can’t sustain them any longer than a day.

Without saying as much out loud, Hannah’s face crumpled, her cheeks and forehead turned red and blotchy, and she wept silently.

The entire drama of the scene happened in her expression, and without Dunham’s malleabili­ty and carefully calibrated breakdown, it wouldn’t have been clear what had happened, or so clearly devastatin­g that this couple had finally come to the end of their very long road.

That episode made me watch Dunham’s performanc­e in the penultimat­e half-hour of the show even more closely than usual.

There’s no moment as obviously actorly as the diner scene, but as Hannah wanders around New York for the last time, Dunham convinces us that it’s right for her to move away in a dozen little ways: Her face falls once her friend Elijah (Andrew Rannells) leaves a scene, freeing her to stop making an effort; she smiles, laughs, telegraphs with her eyebrows as she flirts wordlessly on the subway; her bad dancing, a recurring joke on the show, acquires a new grace after a fight with her friends confirms for Hannah that she has made the correct decision.

I hate that Girls is ending right at the moment when Dunham is playing Hannah with such precision and lovely vulnerabil­ity.

But in this end is a beginning: Maybe in a new, less-autobiogra­phical role, Dunham will be able to show her critics the character she creates and the wonderful actress she has become. – Washington Post

Dunham’s face is already soft and relaxed from speaking to the baby, and as Adam makes this suggestion, her mouth collapses in on itself, folding in at the corners and the lips.

 ?? Picture: HBO ?? PERFECT: Jemima Kirke and Lena Dunham in the penultimat­e episode of Girls.
Picture: HBO PERFECT: Jemima Kirke and Lena Dunham in the penultimat­e episode of Girls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa