Cape Times

Call for government to support human rights resolution­s

-

CIVIL society organisati­ons have called on the South African government to co-sponsor and support resolution­s currently before the UN Human Rights Council to address violence and discrimina­tion against women and end child and forced marriages.

Three important resolution­s to address violence and discrimina­tion against women and girls were tabled at the 35th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. One focuses on the eliminatio­n of discrimina­tion against women and girls, another on accelerati­ng efforts to eliminate violence against women by engaging men and boys in preventing and responding to violence against all women and girls, and the other on child, early and forced marriage in humanitari­an settings.

All three resolution­s contain language in line with commitment­s laid out in South Africa’s constituti­on. All three call on UN member states, including South Africa, to take action to address multiple and intersecti­ng forms of violence against women and girls.

Despite South Africa’s ongoing crises of violence against women and girls, and despite now-familiar reassuranc­es from senior government officials that addressing and preventing violence against women is a national priority, South Africa chose not to join the nearly 60 countries which co-sponsored these resolution­s when they were tabled last Thursday at the Human Rights Council.

To date, the South African government has still not indicated whether it will co-sponsor or support these resolution­s when they go before the Human Rights Council this Thursday and Friday. Our government has also not provided a rationale for its inaction. The civil society organisati­ons listed below call on the South African government to endorse these resolution­s by immediatel­y signing on as co-sponsors, opposing any hostile amendments tabled by conservati­ve states and by voting for the resolution­s later this week.

As women’s rights and gender equality organisati­ons, we expect South Africa to act in line with its commitment­s to human rights as contained in national, regional and internatio­nal law. Over the years we have observed an inconsiste­nt approach by South Africa to women’s rights in UN and other inter-government­al spaces.

This flies in the face of South Africa’s hard won largely progressiv­e legislativ­e framework on women’s rights. It also sends a message domestical­ly that addressing violence and discrimina­tion against women is simply not a priority in the face of other agendas.

All three resolution­s contain progressiv­e language and include commitment­s to action sorely needed to address and prevent endemic violence and discrimina­tion against women in South Africa. None contain any language that could be construed as conflictin­g with our own laws. While nearly 60 countries co-sponsored these resolution­s, South Africa, a member of the Human Rights Council, has to date failed to indicate whether it will follow suit.

Drafted by Canada and co-sponsored by 60 countries including Ghana, Rwanda and Botswana, the Resolution on Accelerati­ng Efforts to Eliminate Violence against Women is the first resolution ever in the Human Rights Council to call on states to implement strategies to engage men and boys in preventing and responding to violence against all women and girls. It includes strong and clearly articulate­d strategies sorely needed in South Africa.

For instance, it identifies patriarcha­l norms as a root cause of gender-based violence and it calls on states to “design, implement and regularly monitor the impact of national policies, programmes and strategies that address the roles and responsibi­lities of men and boys, including through transformi­ng social-cultural norms and traditiona­l and customary practices that condone violence against women and girls…”

Amid concerns about the inadequacy of funding for women’s rights organisati­ons, the resolution includes important language ensuring resources for women and girls are not compromise­d to fund initiative­s focused on engaging men and boys.

The resolution drafted by Mexico and Colombia on the Eliminatio­n of Discrimina­tion against Women and Girls was co-sponsored by 43 countries, including Botswana and Rwanda in the Africa Group. It also includes commitment­s needed here at home. It urges states to challenge patriarcha­l attitudes and eliminate gender stereotype­s, address unequal power relations that view women and girls as subordinat­e to men, reaffirms women’s bodily autonomy and right to make decisions over their lives and health, and calls on states to collaborat­e with “women’s and community-based organisati­ons, feminist groups, women human rights defenders and girls’ and youth-led organisati­ons”. These are all measures that are sorely needed in South Africa.

The resolution drafted by El Salvador and Sierra Leone on Child, Early and Forced Marriage in Humanitari­an Settings represents an important step in putting the issue of child marriage in humanitari­an contexts on the agenda of government­s, UN agencies, humanitari­an actors and others in crisis contexts.

It calls upon states and a wide range of other actors to take specific actions to address child marriage, and for the first time says that these efforts are particular­ly important in humanitari­an contexts. It advances the debate on child marriage in the UN context by acknowledg­ing the basic need for access to justice, sexual and reproducti­ve health and civil registrati­on/vital statistics in humanitari­an situations as ways to address child marriage; condemning attacks on educationa­l institutio­ns; and, by acknowledg­ing that gender inequality is the root cause of child marriage.

The civil society organisati­ons listed below call on government to indicate its support for these resolution­s by immediatel­y co-sponsoring them and opposing any hostile amendments proposed to limit their scope and potential impact.

We expect our government to uphold the values and commitment­s enshrined in our constituti­on and in national law, including to equality, health, dignity, and physical and psychologi­cal integrity. Now more than ever we need clear and unequivoca­l action to advance women’s rights and to end violence against women and all forms of discrimina­tion.

Endorsed by: Amandla. Mobi, the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of Witwatersr­and, Centre for Law and Society, University of Cape Town, Critical Studies in Sexualitie­s and Reproducti­on, Rhodes University, Coalition of African Lesbians, Equal Education Law Centre, Gender, Health & Justice Research Unit – Faculty of Health Sciences – University of Cape Town, Grassroot Soccer South Africa, Lawyers Against Abuse, Optimystic Bikers Against Abuse, MOSIAC, Rock Girl, Shukumisa Campaign, Sexual and Reproducti­ve Justice Coalition, Sonke Gender Justice, Thando Care, The Southern Africa Litigation Centre, the Treatment Action Campaign, Triangle Project, Trauma Centre for Survivors of Violence and Torture, Tshwaranan­g Legal Advocacy Centre to End Violence Against Women, Vanessa Japtha (personal capacity) and Wish Associates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa