Cape Times

Treasury vague over R9bn jobs fund and R28bn IFMS ‘tender’

- Adri Senekal de Wet

THE NATIONAL Treasury continues to dodge questions about a suspicious R28 billion integrated financial management system (IFMS) “tender”. It has also failed to respond to requests for a full list of the beneficiar­ies of the R9bn Jobs Fund, which President Jacob Zuma announced during his State of the Nation address in February 2011.

Business Report (BR) reported on the Jobs Fund in February and recently followed up with a series of questions to the Treasury about the status of the fund.

These questions related to the amount paid out to date to enterprise­s, how many permanent jobs had been created since 2011 and who managed and implemente­d (the mandate) of the Jobs Fund.

The Treasury was also requested to provide a full list of all the companies, non-government­al organisati­ons (NGOs) and organisati­ons that had received funding from the Jobs Fund since 2011.

BR recently reported on the status of the IFMS and asked who had been awarded this multi-billion “tender” that dates back to when Trevor Manuel was Minister of Finance.

A source close to the Treasury revealed to BR that it had paid Oracle R461 million up front in licensing fees (without a tender), that the amount allocated for the IFMS “tender” currently totalled R28bn, and that there was a suspicious contractua­l agreement between Abacus and the Treasury.

Reply: The Jobs Fund

“To date the fund has demonstrat­ed that it is possible for the private sector, public sector and civil society organisati­ons to collaborat­e, share risk and achieve greater social impact by implementi­ng innovative models for job creation and, thereby, catalysing broader participat­ion and inclusion in the economy.

“Initiative­s supported cover a wide range of interventi­ons, from micro finance to support rural women, to guarantee schemes to crowd in pension fund investment­s for the support of SME (small and medium enterprise) developmen­t, to agricultur­e support for small holder farmers thus contributi­ng to food security and more resilient farmers.

“The fund has also supported initiative­s that have improved the skills match between unemployed youth and existing vacant positions and thereby accelerate­d the transition of youth from education into employment. Through its support the fund has catalysed the achievemen­t of scale in the operations of funding partners thereby resulting in a more inclusive economy.

“In evaluating projects within its portfolio, the fund is able to demonstrat­e how effective design of business incubators can help reduce the failure rate of start-ups. However, the evaluation also notes that the shortage of opportunit­y-driven entreprene­urs is a limiting factor to expanding the sector.

“Well-structured business franchisin­g models have also been identified as an opportunit­y to enhance SME’s chance of success. By the end of March 2016 more than 12 000 businesses had received funding through projects supported by the Jobs Fund.

“The impact and results thus far achieved through the fund’s support for innovative employment creation models indicates that the Jobs Fund’s strategy remains relevant to addressing the challenge of unemployme­nt in South Africa.

More than 155 000 permanent jobs have been created as a result of the interventi­ons of our project partners. Of that, 60 percent of the jobs were taken up by women, 40 percent by men; 60 percent went to youth and 98 percent to previously disadvanta­ged individual­s.

“The fund was establishe­d in June 2011. The first year of operations focused on a design of operating procedures. From mid-2012 to December 2016 the Jobs Fund has focused on building its project pipeline and currently has an approved portfolio of 117 projects, R6.1bn in grant funds have been allocated to these projects.

“Against this grant amount, the fund will potentiall­y leverage an additional R8.6bn from project partners toward job creation. Of the R6.1bn allocated as per the drawdown requests from our matched funding partners, R3.96bn has been disbursed to 110 implementi­ng projects. Disburseme­nts only occur as per the draw-down schedule provided by our project partners and when projects achieve their contracted targets and when projects have paid their matched funding into the project account.

“In addition to the 155 000 sustainabl­e jobs, the Jobs Fund project partners have also created 27 314 short-term jobs and provided work readiness and technical training to 209 845 participan­ts. At a time when it is increasing­ly important that public institutio­ns and programmes transparen­tly account for how public finances are spent, the Jobs Fund has put in place measures to ensure the integrity of the work being done to reduce unemployme­nt, poverty and inequality in South Africa.

“Jobs Fund Partners (JFPs) are held accountabl­e to their approved Activities Based Costing Project Implementa­tion Plans, signed grant agreements, as well as the fund’s operating guideline. As outlined in these crucial documents, there are numerous control measures in place to ensure the integrity of the numbers reported to and by the Jobs Fund.

“To proactivel­y manage project implementa­tion challenges quarterly, site visits are conducted. These site visits also enable the Jobs Fund team to corroborat­e the quarterly reports submitted by JFPs and to collect additional evidence of progress. The site visits also entail meeting directly with project beneficiar­ies.

“Disburseme­nts are output based. A disburseme­nt committee considers the performanc­e of the project against targets set. It considers the analysis submitted by the financial analyst and monitoring and evaluation specialist­s as well as the report of the legal specialist who comment on contractua­l compliance related issues. Projects will receive disburseme­nts for the new quarter only when they have achieved a minimum of 80 percent of the contracted output for the previous quarter.

“The Jobs Fund performs a validation check, on a sample basis, of the reported performanc­e and expenditur­e numbers on a quarterly basis. This validation is performed against a set of agreed evidence, such as employment contracts, letters of employment, payroll informatio­n, certificat­es of training completion, invoices, bank statements, and loan books. The fund will withhold disburseme­nt if this requiremen­t is not met, until the JFP and its allocated team develops a remedial action plan to ensure that the project meets all requiremen­ts for the next disburseme­nt period as well as make up for the shortfall of the previous one.

“Projects are required to conduct performanc­e audits, which assess the validity, accuracy and completene­ss of the project’s quarterly reporting informatio­n. Projects are required to submit annual audit reports based on the terms of reference circulated for auditors by the fund as well as consult with the fund when appointing their auditors. Over and above this, the fund annually conducts independen­t audits of sample projects to verify performanc­e of the selected projects. The Jobs Fund itself is subject to the National Treasury’s internal audit framework as well as that of the Auditor-General of South Africa.

“In support of the fund’s learning agenda, it has put in place a monitoring and evaluation framework that prescribes that projects undergo multi-level evaluation­s. These include independen­t mid-term and summative evaluation­s budgeted for before project implementa­tion. The fund also annually selects projects that could provide insight into effective project design and implementa­tion or that provide insight into how best to achieve scale. The Jobs Fund as a programme is also subject to evaluation by independen­t evaluators.

“Good governance is a cornerston­e of the effective operation of the fund and enables it to ensure that public funds are targeted toward addressing the challenges of unemployme­nt, poverty and inequality and thereby contributi­ng toward the achievemen­t of inclusive economic growth”. The National Treasury ignored the request for a full list of the successful applicants.

IFMS

Various requests via e-mail and in person to the Treasury media representa­tives remain unanswered. BR recently launched the BR Corruption Buster Series. The team shall investigat­e. BR is concerned that no media statement or tender has been issued about the allocation of R28bn for the implementa­tion of the IFMS.

Minister Malusi Gigaba’s spokespers­on, Mayihlome Tshwete, responded yesterday: “There is no attempt on the part of the National Treasury to conceal anything pertaining to IFMS. The concerns of IFMS have been identified and corrective remedial actions are being finalised. Minister Gigaba has requested the DG (director-general) to resolve the matters that are still outstandin­g with urgency. We expect to brief the public on this soon.”

‘The fund annually conducts independen­t audits of sample projects to verify the performanc­e of the selected projects.’

 ??  ?? Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba requests the DG to investigat­e IFMS.
Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba requests the DG to investigat­e IFMS.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa