Cape Times

The growth of coastal shipping

- Brian Ingpen

EARLY residents of Port Shepstone, Port St Johns and Port Alfred watched small vessels running the gauntlet of swell, current and sandbanks to enter the respective river mouths, bringing cargo from other ports.

Sugar baron CG Smith chartered a vessel – which he later bought – to move sugar cane from the Port Shepstone area to Durban. The service grew and was extended to Port St Johns.

When the railway reached Port Shepstone, the sugar cane was railed to Durban, and with southbound trains carrying consumer goods, once the lifeblood of the coasters, the river port closed in 1901. Determined to succeed in the coastal trade, Smith sent his tiny ships to East London, Algoa Bay and Knysna, but only later, did the company come into its own as its steamers traded as far as Cape Town.

Another coasting company (that later would absorb Smiths and Thesens that had been the main operator along the west coast) began as Frontier Steamship 1922 Company when its first ship was bought while she was ashore on Durban’s breakwater! Salvaged and repaired, Frontier operated to Port St Johns at the mouth of the Umzimvubu River. Because of the largely uncharted river mouths, groundings were frequent; when the 31-metre coaster Border stranded at the mouth of the river, she was dragged into deeper water by a team of oxen! Frontier was not so lucky and was wrecked there in 1927. Badly silted from serious erosion in its catchment area, and suffering from road competitio­n, the Umzimvubu River mouth closed as a commercial port in 1946.

From that beginning grew African Coasters, morphing into the largest of the three coasting companies.

Small ships anchored at Port Beaufort at the mouth of the Breede River to load; as late as the 1930s, some tiny vessels steamed over 25 kilometres upstream to Malagas to discharge drums of water, household goods and agricultur­al implements, and to load grain, wool and skins for Cape Town.

In the post-war years, the coasting companies struggled. Most of their ships were older steamers. Their owners were unable to buy more modern vessels as they were struggling against the inhibitive sea-competitiv­e railway rates, introduced by the Cape colonial government in 1908 when special freight rates were used for items railed between Cape Town and other Cape ports.

Expanded by the post-Union government to include freight railed between all ports, that railway rating policy became one of the most contentiou­s issues underminin­g the developmen­t of coastal shipping. The system, the railways argued, was merely to prevent coasting companies applying monopolist­ic tariffs, yet anomalies abounded. For example, it was cheaper to rail cargo from Cape Town to Durban than over the shorter distance from Worcester to Pietermari­tzburg! The coasters had little hope of competing with these low freight rates.

As the railways formed part of the quasi-government South African Railways & Harbours Administra­tion, it was not entirely profit-driven and ironically, the coasters paid harbour dues to the same organisati­on that was undercutti­ng their freight rates. Thus the coasters helped to fund the ports whose profits went into SAR&H’s kitty that subsidised the unfair railway rates! And the coasters also competed against Union-Castle whose mailships had plenty of space for coastwise cargo during their South African coastal passage.

A commission inquiring into a coal shortage in Cape ports reported that a major reason for the shortages was that trains carrying coal from Witbank to the Cape were delayed because of the number of other trains on the railway system. The commission recommende­d that the sea competitiv­e rates be abolished so that the coasters could carry a larger share of the interport cargoes, relieving the pressure on the railway system. In response, the railway rates were revised in 1954, giving the coasters the edge over the railways, and coastal shipping began to grow.

Directly across the Victoria Basin from the Table Bay Hotel, South Arm today is a different place from the busy cargo hub that I knew as a kortbroek. Rather than the trawlers and other fishing craft now using that part of the Victoria Basin, I watched Smith’s coasters Induna and Monita, or Barrier and Boundary dischargin­g cartons of detergents, rolls of newsprint, car tyres, and, destined for the canneries, sweet factories and drinks manufactur­ers of the Cape, masses of sugar in hessian bags with cotton liners.

One of those hessian bags of sugar I would see later at Mr Harnekar’s small general dealer store close to my home in Mowbray. “Two pounds of sugar, please,” my mother would ask the ever-courteous Mr Harnekar who, using an ancient metal scoop, would dispense the sugar from the hessian bag into a brown paper packet. Then, holding the two top corners of the packet, he would twirl it around to close the packet, with no sugar spilling on the floor of his tiny shop. At that stage in my young life, I knew nothing about centrifuga­l force, but simply marvelled at Mr Harnekar’s magical dexterity that kept the sugar in the twirling packet.

Smith’s Coasters was the first local coasting company to modify its fleet of ageing vessels. From German owners, they bought several near-sea ships that were redundant in Europe where trucking systems were on the ascendancy. Soon, quaint coasters, like Ingane, Intombi, Inkosi and their consorts, brought the usual cargoes to Cape Town, returning with canned fruit, liquor and fish products. On their German routes, sistership­s Ingane and Intombi had carried passengers who had a very well-appointed lounge with large windows. As Smith’s ships carried no passengers, officers enjoyed the lounge with a great view.

Initially plying the DurbanEast London trade, the 1947-vintage Voortrekke­r and her successor Voorspeler ran the “Mossel Bay mail”, the service that moved sugar to Mossel Bay for the cannery at Voorbaai.

As part of a fleet renewal programme in the early 1960s, African Coasters bought three ships from the Ellerman group. At the time, the trio were the fastest local coasters, but their reciprocat­ing main engine, plus an exhaust turbine fed by two boilers, consumed 30 tons of fuel per day, a factor that affected their profitabil­ity and shortened their careers. Their passenger accommodat­ion – six twin-berth cabins – was invariably filled, especially when they were switched to foreign trades.

Three major events in the mid-1960s transforme­d the coasting sector. An injection of funds from Union Corporatio­n into African Coasters in 1964 revitalise­d the company that became Unicorn Lines, which then absorbed rivals Smith’s Coasters and later, Thesens, the west coast specialist­s, about whom I wrote last month. The third and extremely significan­t event was Unicorn ordering from Durban yards of the first of 11 ships, boosting local shipbuildi­ng and expanding the employment base.

The 4454-deadweight Tugela was the first of three similar Durban-built ships. With comfortabl­e accommodat­ion for their crew, these were natty little ships, well designed to carry local cargoes of newsprint, palletised sugar, household detergents and canned products. That they lasted more than 30 years was testimony to the standard of local shipbuildi­ng and meticulous maintenanc­e by Unicorn.

These ships, however, were not designed to carry many convention­al containers. With the containeri­sation of the South Africa-Europe trade on the horizon, Unicorn ordered two geared Trampco vessels for the coastal trade, followed closely by another slightly larger pair, each with a special deep tank to carry fish oil from Walvis Bay.

As the coastal trade was growing rapidly and container feeder services would form an integral part of the containeri­sed deepsea services, Unicorn needed these ships before the formal advent of containeri­sation in South Africa. Therefore, Unicorn was not impressed with delays in delivery dates of the second pair of Trampco ships, for which the Durban shipyard had to pay nearly R250 000 in penalties, a hefty sum 40 years ago!

But these were good ships, carrying break-bulk and containeri­sed cargoes, and running in concert with the first South African-operated containers­hip, Unicorn’s 104-teu Voorloper that moved containers between Durban and Cape Town from 1971.

Indeed, the coastwise containeri­sed service forms its own story. Watch this space!

I wish readers a blessed Christmas.

 ?? Picture: Brian Ingpen Collection ?? MULTI-PURPOSE VESSEL: Durban-built Verge entered service in 1973 and spent 14 years in Unicorn colours before being sold for trading in the Pacific and Melanesian Islands.
Picture: Brian Ingpen Collection MULTI-PURPOSE VESSEL: Durban-built Verge entered service in 1973 and spent 14 years in Unicorn colours before being sold for trading in the Pacific and Melanesian Islands.
 ?? Picture: Brian Ingpen ?? DURBAN BUILT: Tugela, the first ship ordered by Unicorn from a Durban shipyard for the weekly coastwise service from Durban.
Picture: Brian Ingpen DURBAN BUILT: Tugela, the first ship ordered by Unicorn from a Durban shipyard for the weekly coastwise service from Durban.
 ?? Picture: Brian Ingpen/George Young Collection ?? RIVER BOUND: The coaster Chub off the mouth of the Breede River in the 1930s. She was wrecked later on the west coast.
Picture: Brian Ingpen/George Young Collection RIVER BOUND: The coaster Chub off the mouth of the Breede River in the 1930s. She was wrecked later on the west coast.
 ?? Picture: Unicorn Collection ?? EARLY SUGAR CARRIER: Smith’s Nahoon sailing from Cape Town circa 1953. She was scrapped in Durban after 26 winters on the coastal trade.
Picture: Unicorn Collection EARLY SUGAR CARRIER: Smith’s Nahoon sailing from Cape Town circa 1953. She was scrapped in Durban after 26 winters on the coastal trade.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa