Setting up a new model for world human rights
China has opened up a path that focuses on prevention and addresses extremism
FOR PEOPLE of the world, human rights, including the rights of the person and political, economic, social, and cultural rights, represent the common aspiration and pursuit for all. Accordingly, governments around the world are duty-bound to guarantee people’s rights to subsistence and development, and to secure people’s fundamental rights to food, to shelter, to work, to school and to hospital, and to ensure people’s happiness as the greatest achievement of human rights.
Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the Communist Party of China (CPC) has always strived to pursue happiness for the people and development for mankind, transforming China from a country of basic survival to a world development miracle.
Today, the 1.3 billion Chinese people are enjoying their life of peace, freedom and happiness, free of fear of war or conflict. China, with its fastest human rights progress and best practices of human rights protection, is setting up a new model for the world cause of human rights.
The CPC and the Chinese government have always been committed to uplifting living standards of the Chinese people. After four decades of reform and opening up, China’s per capita gross domestic product has soared from $227 in 1978 to nearly $9000 in 2017. Per capita disposable income of urban and rural residents have respectively increased by 106.1 and 100.2 fold.
About 750 million people have been lifted out of poverty. More importantly, by the end of 2020, poverty will be eliminated across the 1.4 billion population. This is the commitment by the CPC and Chinese government to the human rights cause of mankind.
The Chinese people enjoy ample education and employment opportunities. China follows a system of nine-year compulsory education, and high school education is also accessible to all across the entire country.
There are 2 913 institutions of higher education, enrolling 37.79 million students. With more than 11 million new jobs created each year, China has managed to contain its unemployment rate at or under 5%.
The Chinese people enjoy comprehensive social security benefits. By June 2018, the number of participants in the basic endowment insurance, employment insurance, and workrelated injury insurance respectively registered 925 million, 191 million, and 230 million. More than 1.3 billion people are covered by the basic medical insurance. Average life expectancy has reached 76.7 years, and the maternal mortality ratio has dropped from 94.7 in 1989 to 19.6 in 2017 per 100 000 population.
The Chinese people enjoy a high degree of personal freedom and the freedom of speech. There are 802 million internet users, over 1.3 billion mobile phone users, and 788 million mobile internet subscribers in China.
The internet penetration rate is 57.7%. Active internet bloggers register over 400 million, and on average over 30 billion posts are published every day. Within the scope of the law, anyone can express his or her views anywhere, any time. In China, anyone can travel freely and safely at any time to anywhere. Online shopping has also reached all corners of China.
The Chinese people enjoy full religious freedom and a most inclusive social environment. All the world’s major religions, including Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Christianity are practised in China with nearly 200 million religious believers, over 380 000 religious personnel, and 144 000 lawfully registered religious sites for worship.
In Xinjiang alone, there are 24 400 Islamic mosques, more than doubling the combined numbers of the US, Britain, Germany, and France.
Some people in the West accuse the Chinese government’s vocational training programmes in Xinjiang of “racial segregation”, “religious persecution”, or “re-education camp”. Such claims are clearly driven by ill-intention or mere bias and prejudice.
The vocational training schools established in Xinjiang offer free training opportunities for the local young people and assist them in finding jobs or starting a business. This is a major innovation by the Chinese government to tackle extremism and terrorism. Thanks to this practice and other measures, Xinjiang has remained for two consecutive years free from violent terrorist attacks, and the number of criminal and security offences has drastically declined.
Today, people in the region feel much safer than before.
In 2017, Xinjiang’s GDP grew by 7.6%. The region received over 100 million tourists from home and abroad, an increase of 32.4%.
What has happened proves that by abandoning the Western practice of “fighting violence with violence”, China has opened up a new path that focuses on prevention and addresses both the symptoms and root causes of extremism and terrorism, realising the human rights of the widest population to the greatest extent.
Unfortunately, some countries in the West would still stubbornly cling to the “zero-sum game” and the Cold War mentality, and would engage in ideology-driven double-standards, viewing others through a coloured lens, using human rights as a political tool to punish developing countries, and wilfully pointing fingers at others while disregarding their own gross violations against human rights.
Our news networks are filled with stories and images of atrocities that happened in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. These countries, with thousands of years of history and once with great infrastructures, have been reduced to rubble. Countless homes were destroyed and many people were displaced, deprived of the most basic human rights of safety and basic living.
These are exactly the consequences of the Western countries’ interference in others’ domestic affairs under the disguise of human rights.
Who should be responsible for the human rights tragedy in the Middle East? Anyone with a conscience should know the answer. When the refugees from these countries were forced to leave their home to seek a living in the Western countries, many of them were turned down or became “second-class citizens”. Who is really caring about their human rights? Who is advocating for the basic human rights for the peoples of the Middle East? And who is condemning the human rights violators there?
As always, the Western governments and media care only about the human rights of the few who have committed crimes, but would selectively ignore the basic human rights of the vast majority of the people.
The Chinese people are very proud of the fact that we have never launched a war of aggression against others and have never occupied an inch of land of another country. Even in the resolution of the colonial historical problems of Hong Kong and Macau, China did not resort to violence, but innovatively proposed the concept of “One Country, Two Systems” to realise the peaceful sovereignty handover.
Such ability of China to draw wisdom from its 5 000 years of history to innovate solutions may be too hard to fathom by the West.
We believe that development is the fundamental solution to improving human rights. Over the past decades, China has helped Africa build over 10 000km of roads, more than 6 000km of railways, and hundreds of airports, ports and power plants.
China has trained for Africa hundreds of thousands of experts and technicians across multiple fields, so as to support African industrialisation and agricultural modernisation to achieve its self-sustainable development.
Propagating the slogans of “freedom, democracy, human rights, and rule of law” by Western countries will not address the need of the African people. It begs the question: Where are the infrastructures developed by the West in Africa?
We sincerely hope the West will take concrete actions to help Africa address the three development bottlenecks of inadequate infrastructure, lack of professional and skilled personnel, and lack of financial resources.
We also sincerely hope the Western countries look at themselves in the mirror before pointing fingers at others. Don’t forget the strong voices of “We are the 99%” from Occupy Wall Street. And why is the “Yellow Vests” movement spreading across Europe?
And if all of us would follow a certain country in building high walls along our borders and stopping the free movement of the people, would there still be any more freedom that all of us cherish so much?
There is no best human rights practice in this world, but we can always strive to do better. We are willing to strengthen human rights dialogue and exchange with countries around the world, to complement and draw strengths from one another for common progress. Nevertheless, we would always reject with the firmest resolve the practice of selective and double standards in human rights.