Cape Times

COLLUSION CONFESSION

- Banele Ginindza

PARAMOUNT Mills is the latest company in the industry to be slapped with a fine after it acknowledg­ed engaging in collusive behaviour in which it admits to agreeing with its competitor­s to fix prices for milled white maize products and fix trading conditions from 1999 to 2006. The Competitio­n Tribunal confirmed the order for an administra­tive fine of R1.3 million. According to the settlement papers, representa­tives of Paramount attended meetings and engaged in telephone conversati­ons with competitor­s. The cartel directly fixed dates on which such agreed price increases were to be implemente­d and exchanged informatio­n about their pricing structures. According to the settlement agreement, Paramount must pay half of the penalty within 10 days and the balance must be paid in 12 equal instalment­s, with the last instalment being paid on or before January 31 next year. Paramount is the 13th maize company in this case that has entered into an agreement with the Competitio­n Commission over the years. In March 2007, the commission started investigat­ing whether Tiger Brands, Pioneer Foods, Foodcorp, Pride Milling and Progress Milling violated competitio­n laws after the commission received a corporate leniency applicatio­n from Premier, which was corroborat­ed by a further corporate leniency applicatio­n by Tiger Brands that same year. Other maize milling companies were later investigat­ed. These included Bothaville Milling, Godrich Milling, TWK Milling, Keystone Milling, Westra Milling, Carolina Mills, Brenner Mills, Paramount Mills, NTK Milling, Kalel Mills and Blinkwater Mills. In terms of the commission’s corporate leniency policy, a cartel member can disclose informatio­n on a cartel in return for immunity from prosecutio­n and fines. |

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa