Gender discussions far from exhausted

MARK Keohane wrote an opinion article on August 23 about how gender equality is not about denouncing gender, but rather about how we treat each other.

He said this in response to World Rugby adopting a policy of gender neutrality for their tournaments.

To some extent, I affirm Mark’s standpoint on the matter. However, in this ongoing discussion about gender equality, it does seem as if we distort the lines (deliberately or nondeliberately) between our ontology (our being human) and our function (how we do what we do).

I would argue that our humanity finds expression differently, namely, as male and female.

I fear that our noble attempts at reforming and redressing the unequal gendered social structures – by employing gender balance, whether at home, at work or on the field – might be harmful to our society. I believe we should therefore err on the side of caution as we approach gender reform.

Subtly, a not well-defined gender equality system of ideas may create a form of Western imperialism towards the women in non-Western countries.

More obviously, women may be pushed to emulate men and even become like them, without addressing male dominance in the form of misogyny.

Yes, the topic of gender equality may feel as if it’s been exhausted. Many may feel discouraged or frustrated by it. I would urge us, however, to continue to humbly think through and aim to reach a proper understanding of gender. ANDERSON PHILANDER | Kuils River