Survé’s statement
I AM DEEPLY saddened by the events of yesterday, during which several members of the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), accompanied by several officers of the SAPS, descended on the offices of Sekunjalo Investment Holdings and African Equity Empowerment Investments (AEEI).
The intruders arrived unannounced and were tasked to confiscate computers and hard drives on the pretext of obtaining evidence of irregular trading of the aforementioned companies as it pertains to AYO Technology Solutions (PTY) Limited (AYO).
AYO has formed the centrepiece of the recent Public Investment Corporation (PIC) Commission of Inquiry into alleged wrongdoing at the state asset manager, which is also a shareholder in AYO.
I cannot speak for AYO, as I am not on the board, or part of the management team, but I can speak for Sekunjalo and categrically confirm that there is nothing untoward in our business practices or ethics.
I am also of the opinion this is true of AEEI.
Earlier in the year, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) issued a compliance notice to AYO demanding that AYO return the investment to the PIC. This was declared null and void by a court of law, but served to continue misrepresenting my truth and that of these aforementioned companies via the media.
The FSCA’s raid is a similar tactic designed to focus yet more negative attention on companies that I am associated with.
I firmly believe that what transpired is a concerted and organised effort to personally discredit me and undermine the organisations in which I have a vested interest, in an effort
to “control” me and the reporting that is carried out through Independent Media, of which I am chairman.
These are classic intimidation tactics carried out by an increasingly desperate cohort of politically entrenched cronies whose pockets are intrinsically linked to wholesale looting and corruption of state coffers.
It is the people of South Africa from whom they are stealing, and it is our duty as a free media to report on all stories that affect the greater good of this country and our longterm economic survival.
For the record, had the FSCA asked, we would have been more than willing to hand over the requested documents.
Of great concern to us, however, is that the information and method of retrieving this data has potentially put these companies into a tenuous position, as the company computers and hard drives also contain sensitive information pertinent to the day-to-day business of each company that can potentially benefit rivals, if it falls into the wrong hands.
Further, there is a huge conflict of interest as chairman of the Financial Services Board, and the caretaking FSCA commissioner, is Abel Sithole, who is also the principal officer of the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), whose funds the PIC invests.
I do solemnly believe this is also an underhanded attempt to obtain information relating to our legal case against the PIC and the GEPF.
It is also curious how these investigators did not ask who they should approach to retrieve particular computers. They immediately marched directly to the person who would have an intimate understanding of the company’s dealings.
This smacks of a pre-determined agenda and detailed knowledge of our office layout. I also need to ask the question, how is it that a television broadcast news team arrived at our offices, if this had not been carefully orchestrated?
There are dark forces at play in South Africa and I want to make it categorically and abundantly clear to all who read this that I will not be intimidated; Independent Media will not be silenced.
We will continue to shed light on the darkness.