Knife-wielding attacker was on police radar
AHAMED Aathil Mohamed Samsudeen was under police surveillance when he attacked a group of people at an Auckland supermarket on Friday. Authorities knew he was a threat, but New Zealand’s laws could not keep him in jail.
They were aware that he previously possessed knives and extremist materials, and that he sympathized with the Islamic State. He had spent three years in prison but was released in July.
Police had been working aroundthe-clock, watching his every move for weeks. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern had been briefed on his case.
That the 32-year-old immigrant was still able to grab a kitchen knife from a display at the store and begin a stabbing rampage that injured seven people has raised questions about New Zealand’s counterterrorism laws.
On Saturday, Ardern committed to tightening those laws by the end of the month. “We must be willing to make the changes that we know may not necessarily have changed history,
but could change the future,” she said at a news conference.
Undercover officers were outside the store on Friday, Police Commissioner Andrew Coster said. Those officers heard shouting and saw shoppers running from the store. They rushed in and “engaged” Samsudeen, shooting him dead.
A Tamil Muslim from Sri Lanka, Samsudeen arrived in New Zealand in 2011 on a student visa and sought refugee status. He first came to police attention in 2016 after he expressed sympathy on Facebook for recent terrorist attacks, violent war-related videos and comments advocating violent extremism. The police spoke with him twice.
In 2017, he was arrested at the airport in Auckland; authorities believed
he was headed to Syria, where the Islamic State was involved in that nation’s civil war. A search of his apartment turned up a hunting knife and “restricted publications,” Ardern said.
He was released on bail, but he was arrested again in 2018 after he bought another knife. In another apartment search, police found extremist materials, including Islamic State videos. This time, he was kept in custody, spending three years in prison after pleading guilty to numerous charges.
In May, he faced new charges in connection with those videos. A jury found him guilty, but because the videos didn’t contain violence, such as killings, that other Islamic State videos