Cape Times

Johnson’s tax plan angers party

-

LONDON: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson set out plans yesterday to raise taxes on workers, employers and some investors to try to fix a health and social care funding crisis, angering some in his governing party by breaking an election promise.

After spending huge amounts of money to fight the Covid-19 pandemic, Johnson is returning to an early pledge to address Britain’s creaking social care system, where costs are projected to double as the population ages over the next two decades.

He also moved to try to tackle a backlog in Britain’s health system, which has seen millions waiting months for treatment from the staterun National Health Service, after resources were refocused to deal with those suffering from the coronaviru­s.

“It would be wrong for me to say that we can pay for this recovery without taking the difficult but responsibl­e decisions about how we finance it,” Johnson told Parliament.

“It would be irresponsi­ble to meet the costs from higher borrowing and higher debt,” he said, outlining tax increases that broke a promise made in his election manifesto not to increase such levies to fund social care.

British politician­s have tried for years to find a way to pay for social care, but successive Conservati­ve and Labour prime ministers have ducked the issue because they feared it would anger voters and their own parties.

Ignoring loud disquiet in his party, Johnson outlined what he described as a new health and social care levy that will see the rate of National Insurance payroll taxes paid by workers and employers rise by 1.25 percentage points, with the same increase also applied to the tax on shareholde­r dividends.

He said the hikes would raise £36 billion (R710bn) over three years.

Johnson has tried to cool anger within his party, for decades seen as a defender of low taxes, over the hikes, which several lawmakers fear could lose them support at the 2024 election.

He explained that elderly Britons would no longer face crippling costs that have forced many to sell their homes to pay for their care, and that he could never have predicted the pandemic which has further stretched services.

“You can’t fix health and social care without long-term reform. The plan I’m setting out today will fix all of those problems together,” he said, to jeers and laughter from opposition Labour Party lawmakers.

Labour leader Keir Starmer was quick to pounce on the fears which have swept through the Conservati­ves since snippets of the new policy found their way into the media.

“This is a tax rise that breaks a promise that the PM made at the last election. Read my lips, the Tories (Conservati­ves) can never again claim to be the party of low tax,” Starmer said.

Like many other Western leaders, Johnson is facing demands to spend more on welfare even though government borrowing has ballooned to 14.2% of economic output .

For Johnson, who helped win the 2016 Brexit vote and then as PM presided over Britain’s exit from the EU, fixing social care “once and for all” offers a possible way to broaden his domestic legacy. In 2019, Johnson said he had a plan for social care and promised to prevent the elderly having to sell their houses to pay for care. But his proposals are a gamble.

Critics say Johnson is expanding state spending yet again without any clear reform of the way social care is administer­ed, and that the rise in National Insurance payments will disproport­ionately hit the young and lower paid workers.

The alternativ­es to raising national insurance are increasing income tax or imposing a wealth tax of some kind.

Under the current care system, anyone with assets over £23 350 pays for their care in full. This can lead to spiralling costs and the complete liquidatio­n of someone’s assets.

Johnson said from April 2023, no one would have to pay more than £86 000 towards the cost of care over their lifetime. Those with assets under £20000 will have their care costs fully covered by the state, while those with between £20 000 and £100 000 of assets will receive means-tested state support.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa