Cape Times

Child killer Volkwyn ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing’

- CHEVON BOOYSEN chevon.booysen@inl.co.za

“IT TAKES a village to raise a child but unfortunat­ely, in this matter, it took a village to kill one.”

This was an argument in mitigation of sentencing for convicted child killer Melvin Volkwyn, by his attorney Susan Kuun, who submitted that the neglect and disregard for a court order by slain Orderick Lucas’s mother, Davidene Lucas, and father Kounkou Dziendelet and his grandmothe­r and grandfathe­r, were circumstan­ces that had to be considered for a lesser sentence.

By contrast, Volkwyn was likened by State prosecutor Robin Lewis to a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” who had waited for the opportune time, after gaining the trust of the toddler’s loved ones and then murdering Orderick.

This was heard in the Western Cape High Court yesterday as sentencing proceeding­s got under way for Volkwyn, who was convicted last month of the murder of Orderick. The toddler’s lifeless body was found dumped in a stormwater drain after he had been missing for eight days.

Kuun said: “It is the submission of the defence that every person that knew that Orderick wasn’t well cared for, that Orderick was not being fed, that Orderick was not where he was supposed to be - and that includes his parents and grandparen­ts - were supposed to stand next to the accused in this matter.”

Kuun further submitted that imprisonin­g Volkwyn for an extended period would not be the solution as there are “underlying problems”.

Volkwyn, a qualified hairstylis­t who has two previous conviction­s for drug possession, faces a prescribed minimum sentence of 15 years’ imprisonme­nt for murder.

Lewis said Volkwyn had “misused his position of trust” and disagreed with the defence’s arguments, saying that while Orderick had not grown up in the “most favourable conditions”, the mitigating factors “held no water” as Volkwyn had taken Orderick from a safe environmen­t.

“It was (Volkwyn) who collected (Orderick). It was Volkwyn that took Orderick to a place where they purchased and sold drugs. It was Volkwyn who had taken Orderick back home with him. It was Volkwyn that had killed Orderick,” said Lewis.

In the victim impact report, Lucas – who said she was too emotional to be called to testify – said the heinous deed had affected and traumatise­d her family.

Lucas said she suffered from shock, anxiety and heartache and experience­d immense pain and trauma coming to terms with her child’s death. She said she also blamed herself.

According to Lucas, she looked forward to the day Orderick would go to crèche and aftercare with his siblings and believed “he would have been a beautiful boy if he was still alive today”, adding that Volkwyn had an unhealthy obsession with her toddler son because “he always bought him clothes and had something nice for him without me asking for it”.

Lucas said while she had gone to a Christian rehabilita­tion counsellin­g centre after Orderick’s death, she felt helpless.

“I was alone with my pain and felt helpless. They couldn’t help me because it was a centre for drug rehabilita­tion and nobody there had lost a child. I had many nightmares …

“I just want to ask Mel why he did what he did to my child and what the reason was. He was an innocent baby with his whole future ahead of him,” Lucas said in the report.

Acting judge Nolundi Nyati postponed the matter to September 28 for sentencing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa