Cape Times

SA energy crisis can be remedied and in a shorter time than thought

- Paul Tuson is a Power Systems specialist with more than 30 years’ experience in power electrical engineerin­g in Africa, the US, the UK, the Middle East, Central Asia, South East Asia, Australia and the Caribbean.

SOUTH Africans are currently experienci­ng up to 10 hours of load shedding per day and we are hovering between level 5 and level 6 and possibly higher.

Maintenanc­e on Eskom coal plants is being delayed due to “skills and liquidity challenges”, the Eskom gas power plants in the Cape and the private Avon and Dedisa gas power plants are running up billions in fuel and operating costs, and sometimes the diesel fuel logistics can’t keep up.

Koeberg appears to be hurtling towards a disaster with a dropped reactor, an expiring nuclear operating licence and delayed maintenanc­e and upgrades, and there is an exodus of key technical and managerial skills. When both Koeberg units are off, transmissi­on losses to the Cape amount to an entire unit of a typical Eskom “sixpack” power station, ie 500MW.

The current energy crisis seems hopeless and our trust in our national leadership even more so. However, the energy problems are fixable, and in a shorter time than expected and in fact, with the correct interventi­ons, South Africa could be exporting excess electricit­y to its neighbours.

The interventi­ons and solutions are as follows:

Install rooftop solar PV and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) at every structural­ly sound industrial, commercial, educationa­l, medical and residentia­l structure in the country.

Install utility-scale solar PV generation together with BESSs around the country, even in areas with less attractive solar irradiatio­n levels, but only where transmissi­on and distributi­on capacity are available. This will provide geographic­al diversity for natural weather patterns, dispersion of generation closer to load centres, and resilience for extreme weather events.

Construct key strategic transmissi­on lines in the Northern Cape and adequately compensate land owners for transmissi­on line servitudes and power lines on their properties. This would unlock an immediate 5 to 10 GWs of shovel-ready utility-scale IPP solar PV projects.

Contract Floating Storage Regasifica­tion Units (FSRUs) and construct 1GW open cycle gas turbines (OCGTs) in conjunctio­n with these FSRUs at key coastal cities such as Richards Bay, East London, Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth) and Saldanha Bay.

Rooftop Solar PV and BESS

The South Africa Housing Market Report – 2020 – states there are 16.9 million households in South Africa. If a 5kW PV system is installed on 16.9 million residentia­l structures, this amounts to 84GW of electricit­y capacity, nearly three times the country’s maximum demand.

If only 1/10th of these households can support a 5kW PV system, this would imply 8.4GW of capacity and if only 1/20th, this amounts to 4.2GW. 4.2GW is the capacity of a large Eskom coal-fired “6-pack” power station and more than twice the capacity of the Koeberg nuclear power station in Cape Town.

Due to the diurnal characteri­stic of the sun and because of clouds and rain, this would not provide aroundthe-clock energy, but it would be an important addition to energy supply and could be significan­tly improved by adding BESSs, to be charged when the sun shines and discharged at night.

Add to the above 4.2GW capacity, capacity from office blocks, commercial buildings, schools, factories, hospitals, warehouses, and millions of car ports and car parking areas, and the potential capacity from solar PV is significan­tly larger.

Legislatio­n is urgently required to allow consumers to become prosumers, ie consumers who can also export their power to the grid and be compensate­d for it, albeit at differenti­al tariffs, time of use tariffs should be implemente­d to encourage better electricit­y use behaviour. Tax incentives and financial models from large financial institutio­ns should be accelerate­d to assist customers who would find the capital outlay for solar PV and BESS systems prohibitiv­e. Rooftop PV and the BESS system can be installed within weeks/months.

Geographic­ally Dispersed Utility Scale Solar PV Generation and BESS

Over the past decade and as a result of the Renewable Independen­t Power Producer Programme, Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) developers (ie solar PV and wind developers) have been identifyin­g VRE sites with the best solar irradiatio­n and wind resources.

However, transmissi­on line capacity is diminishin­g, and in the Northern Cape, close to Upington, the transmissi­on capacity is used up.

VRE IPPs should be encouraged to install geographic­ally dispersed VRE plants, close to transmissi­on and distributi­on

infrastruc­ture and close to load centres. This would decrease electricit­y transport losses, provide geographic­al diversity for natural weather patterns and resilience for extreme weather events. Utility scale VRE power plants and BESS can be installed within a year.

Transmissi­on lines in the Northern Cape

Currently there are only two 400kV transmissi­on lines from Aries Substation in the northern Cape (near Upington) to the key load centres of Gauteng, the Free State, Kwazulu Natal and the Northern Province. Each 400kV line can transport roughly 500MW (0.5GW).

There is an estimated 5GW to 10GW of planned and shovel-ready utility-scale IPP solar PV projects in the northern Cape, where the solar irradiatio­n levels are the best in the country.

This IPP capacity cannot be connected to the transmissi­on system as the transmissi­on lines from the Upington area are already running at their full capacity.

Additional transmissi­on lines out of the Upington area have already been planned and designed, however, servitudes/wayleaves cannot be obtained from landowners on the routes of the 400kV transmissi­on lines. Servitudes for these transmissi­on lines need to be secured for the national good, and some mechanism of attractive compensati­on needs to be offered to these landowners to secure these servitudes. It is possible to build 400kV lines in two years with the correct procedures in place.

FSRUs and 1GW OCGTs

As the penetratio­n of inverter-based VRE generation increases, the need

for mitigating flexible power plants increases, to counteract the intermitte­ncy and variabilit­y of the VRE.

System flexibilit­y can be obtained from BESSs, but another important source of flexibilit­y comes from Open Cycle Gas Turbines (OCGTs) and Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs).

Flexible thermal power plants also provide fault level and system inertia, and they can be called upon during extended bad-weather periods, or as back-up generation when other convention­al synchronou­s generation has unplanned and planned outages. The capital cost of OCGTs and ICEs is low, but the fuel costs are high, however, with the correct planning and operation, these thermal power plants should not operate for extended periods, ie not in excess of 5% of a calendar year, which is an environmen­tally acceptable compromise.

Global Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) prices are currently high due to the war in Ukraine, however when the war ends, global prices should return to normal levels.

When LNG arrives at a generating destinatio­n, it needs to be re-gasified, i.e., the liquid gas needs to be turned into gas, which has a much higher volume than LNG.

Re-gasificati­on units can be built on land, close to ports (because of the sea-supply of the LNG), however emergency Floating Storage Regasifica­tion Units (FSRUs) can be employed close to port, and the gas piped to OCGTs and ICEs on land and close to the port. The thermal power stations would then be connected to grid substation­s close to the power plants. OCGTs and ICEs can be constructe­d in under two years if the necessary ESIA authorisat­ions are in place.

Other medium- and longer-term solutions 1

Very large natural gas volumes exist in the north of Mozambique (estimated at a 100 trillion cubic feet). If gas pipelines could be built, similar to the Sasol Temane pipeline, natural gas thermal power plants could be built at non-port sites in South Africa.

2 The Mozambique North-South transmissi­on system should be constructe­d which would unlock the 1200MW Cahora Bassa North Bank hydro generation capacity and the 1500MW Mphanda Nkuwa hydro power project, which lie on the Zambezi River.

3 The large 40GW Grand Inga hydro power plant on the Congo River in the DRC should be expedited together with the long and Extremely High Voltage AC and DC transmissi­on infrastruc­ture to transport this clean energy to South Africa and the rest of Africa.

4 Transmissi­on interconne­ctors between Tanzania and Zambia/Malawi should be expedited to access large quantities of low-cost hydro power from sources like the 6GW Grand Renaissanc­e Hydro Power Plant on the Nile River in Ethiopia.

The above interventi­ons will not provide immediate remedy to South Africa’s power woes, but they can provide an environmen­tally friendly, best-cost, reliable and technicall­y achievable direction for the energy sector in the short, medium and long term.

 ?? ?? KOEBERG appears to be hurtling towards a disaster with a dropped reactor, an expiring nuclear operating licence and delayed maintenanc­e and upgrades, and there is an exodus of key technical and managerial skills, says the author. | LEON LESTRADE African News Agency (ANA)
KOEBERG appears to be hurtling towards a disaster with a dropped reactor, an expiring nuclear operating licence and delayed maintenanc­e and upgrades, and there is an exodus of key technical and managerial skills, says the author. | LEON LESTRADE African News Agency (ANA)
 ?? ?? PAUL TUSON
PAUL TUSON

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa