Cape Times

SA did the right thing taking Israel to the ICJ

- XIN PING The author is a commentato­r on internatio­nal affairs, writing regularly for Xinhua News, Global Times, China Daily, and CGTN

IT HAS been almost four months since Israel launched ground operations in the Gaza Strip. According to the Ministry of Health in Gaza, more than 26 000 people have been killed as a result of Israeli attacks.

The indiscrimi­nate attacks by Israel are serious violations of human rights, which have been condemned by most of the internatio­nal community. But Israel has been refusing a ceasefire till this day, insisting on the eliminatio­n of Hamas as the ultimate goal of its military operation. It disregards the two-state solution, which is the only solution supported by the UN SecretaryG­eneral and most nations globally.

Against such a backdrop, on December 29 last year, South Africa filed a lawsuit with the Internatio­nal Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, suing Israel for violating its obligation­s under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) and demanding that Israel suspend its military operations in and against Gaza, stop acts of genocide and allow more humanitari­an aid into Gaza. The move is a significan­t supplement to the efforts by many countries in the UN Security Council and the General Assembly to urge Israel to agree on a ceasefire.

The greatest significan­ce of South Africa’s litigation lies in pressuring the ICJ to take legally binding measures on Israel so it can agree to a ceasefire and halt its genocide against the Palestinia­ns.

Based on the previous hearing, the ICJ made a preliminar­y ruling on January 26, which confirmed its jurisdicti­on over the lawsuit and ordered provisiona­l measures requiring Israel to take all steps within its power to prevent acts of genocide and allow the provision of humanitari­an assistance into Gaza.

Though the petition for ceasefire was not upheld by the ICJ, the court’s ruling recognised that the Israeli military shall not commit any act of genocide against the Palestinia­n people, thanks to the detailed evidence presented by South Africa which proved that Israel not only has the intent of genocide but also committed the act.

Many public statements by Israeli political and military leaders became strong evidence against themselves. For example, citing the Bible and inciting their Israeli fellow men to “remember what Amalek has done to you” is a clear comparison between the Palestinia­ns and the Amalekites, a race that must be destroyed according to the Hebrew Bible.

The non-stop and indiscrimi­nate military strikes at all kinds of civil infrastruc­ture in the past 110 days caused serious physical and mental harm to the people in Gaza; cutting off daily supplies to the Strip is deliberate­ly inflicting starvation on them. The behaviour, with the fact that 40% of casualties since October 7 are children, seems aimed at the physical destructio­n of the Palestinia­ns in Gaza.

That is why South Africa’s indictment against Israel, based on sufficient facts and evidence, gained support from many countries. Brazil, Türkiye and many Arab countries stood firmly on South Africa’s side. Even in some countries that are “old allies” of Israel, there are voices appealing for justice.

In the US, for instance, there have been pro-Palestinia­n activities and demonstrat­ions. And people have sued the Biden administra­tion for supporting Israel in its barbaric operation. Dr John Mearsheime­r, a scholar in internatio­nal relations, has written in an article supporting South Africa’s lawsuit, condemning the US as an accomplice in this genocide.

But like some government­s or entities that choose to betray their conscience and turn a blind eye to the miserable conditions of the Palestinia­n people, some Western media outlets, which ought to speak for truth and justice, produced little coverage on the lawsuit. It seems they are trying to limit the influence of such an important case with regard to human rights protection and dare not speak out. People cannot help but question their position and the values they live by.

South Africa’s action and the ICJ’s provisiona­l ruling has given most of the world some hope that conscience can beat evil and justice will arrive if only people begin to take the needed action. To support the litigation by South Africa is not only to support the Palestinia­n people but also to support the common good of humanity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa