NSFAS NOW UNDER ADMIN
Decision to dissolve the board follows the resignation of the entity’s chairperson
HIGHER Education Minister Blade Nzimande is expected to explain in the Government Gazette today the legal effect of placing the embattled National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) under administration.
He announced his decision to dissolve the NSFAS board after Ernest Khosa resigned as board chairperson.
Nzimande held an urgent meeting with the board yesterday to share his intended actions.
In the evening his spokesperson Veli Mbele said: “The purpose of the meeting was to communicate the Minister's decision to dissolve the NSFAS Board, with immediate effect and place the institution under administration.”
The last time the scheme was placed under administration was in 2018.
Mbele said the decision was part of the set of interventions meant to improve the organisational efficiency of the entity and to ensure it remained focused on its mandate.
Chaotic scenes of protests have once again erupted at some institutions following delays in the disbursement of student allowances.
The entity has also been making headlines over corruption allegations involving senior executives, with Khosa being the latest to exit after former CEO Andile Nongogo.
Khosa issued a resignation letter to Nzimande, quitting his role as chairperson citing continued safety and security concerns including of his family.
Nzimande accepted his resignation and his office publicly announced it.
These developments come while the public eagerly await the findings of an independent legal firm, Tshisevhe Gwina Ratshimbilani Inc (TGR Attorneys), appointed to investigate the veracity of fraud and corruption allegations against Khosa.
Professor Lourens van Staden has been acting as NSFAS board chairperson for about three months after Khosa “voluntarily” took leave of absence in January amid fraud allegations.
This was in the wake of civil organisation, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) releasing a series of leaked recordings and transcripts of recordings of two meetings allegedly held between Khosa and NSFAS service providers.
The allegations further suggest that he purportedly received financial benefits from these service providers, implying a quid-pro-quo arrangement for facilitating appointments. Additionally, it is alleged that Khosa made decisions in collaboration with service providers.
Nzimande and the SACP were implicated but denied the allegations.
Van Staden confirmed the board's approval of TGR, stating it was a reputable firm.
“The terms of reference are that we want the legal firm to familiarise themselves with the Outa reports, NSFAS Act, the board charter, code of conduct and other relevant documents, to report the veracity of allegations of the Outa report that relates to the board chairperson and the board itself.
“Further to this, (they must) appropriate steps such as audits and risks, and the potential impact of the work of NSFAS in reviewing the contracts of the companies involved in the direct payment and any other related matters that may arise out of the examination and consideration of the report,” said Van Staden.
It is not clear if TGR Attorneys have concluded the report as in February NSFAS stated that the firm was expected
“The City has further taken Nersa’s 22/23 and 23/24 tariff decisions on judicial review.
“These processes are ongoing. It must also be noted that two high court judgments have ruled Nersa’s methodology to be unlawful.
“Nersa must, in terms of the Electricity Regulation Act, enable the City to recover the costs of running an electricity service.
“At Nersa’s recommendation the City’s energy service would run a shortfall of more than R500m in the 2023/24 financial year, placing service delivery and the ending loadshedding programme at severe risk.”
On accumulating hundreds of millions of rand in profits from overcharging customers for electricity, Van Reenen said: “This is false.”
Stop COCT’s Sandra Dickson said: “Nersa and the current system of tariff setting simply do not work for residents and households. It leaves huge opportunity for municipalities like the City of Cape Town to set exploitive tariffs and increases.”