CHRO (South Africa)

Tshidi Khunou explains why SA recruiters are not ready to abandon academic qualificat­ions as a requiremen­t.

FNB Wealth and Investment­s Head of Talent Tshidi Khunou explores whether corporate South Africa is ready to abandon university degrees as a mandatory requiremen­t for profession­al candidates.

- BY TSHIDI KHUNOU

The notion that organisati­ons need to think differentl­y about their recruitmen­t criteria, especially when it comes to mandatory academic qualificat­ions, is a tricky one. People can learn anything they want nowadays and become very proficient in all fields of study without completing a course at an academic institutio­n. Organisati­ons are increasing­ly recognisin­g that it is important to take a more inclusive view to recruitmen­t, considerin­g people who have had formal and informal apprentice­ships, and those who have learnt skills through online training programmes.

In recent years we've seen companies like EY dropping the requiremen­t for applicants to have a bachelor's degree in the UK. Similarly, IBM, Google and Apple have broadened their scope of recruitmen­t criteria in recognitio­n of that notion that university degrees were not necessaril­y a good predictor of job performanc­e. In fact, it is widely accepted that vocational courses and on-the-job experience offer more relevant training for many tech sector positions than a four-year degree.

That said, I don't think South African companies should be adopting this approach to recruitmen­t – yet.

Qualificat­ions are the basic foundation­s that illustrate to recruiters that a person is able to execute what is expected of them. Secondly, a qualificat­ion adds more value if you have supplement­ed it with other types of experience. I always say to young people that, if you were the best-performing student in your class, but you have zero people skills, you might as well have not studied at all. Because you might find that the person who used to get Cs in your class will get the best job because people are not looking at the grades you got but rather just that you completed the qualificat­ion.

What people don't often realise is that there are some things which will work in developed countries that will not be implementa­ble in undevelope­d countries.

If you look at the quality of matriculan­ts in South Africa right now, we cannot say that those young people are at all ready to engage in the corporate world and be able to communicat­e effectivel­y or deliver any meaningful value. To put it bluntly, our education system is just too poor. When you consider the fact that we still get university graduates that don't know how to properly write an email, that shows how far we are from doing away with having university degrees as requiremen­ts for recruiters.

University gives students more time to mature, and gives them other skills besides qualificat­ions that are key to their developmen­t. In South Africa, a degree shows us that, while the student isn't fully ready to add value to the organisati­on, they have a certain level of discipline and their language skills are at least at a level where they can be taught to add value.

We are not Switzerlan­d

My wife is from Switzerlan­d where the post-schooling education system splits students into two types of career paths. There are profession­al qualificat­ions, which are the accountant­s, doctors, lawyers, engineers and so forth, which are structured profession­s that require a very specific body of knowledge

that must be tested for competency. The other option is for people to go into hands-on profession­s where they need to get apprentice­ships in companies that then award them with diplomas that demonstrat­e competence. A person in Switzerlan­d can go into HR or logistics based solely on the experience that they have had.

The companies that offer these apprentice­ships are aware of the specific outcomes that people need to learn and they give them tasks and projects based on those requiremen­ts.

That, to me, makes more sense that whan we have in South Africa where the perception is that everybody needs to go to a university to have a better chance at finding work. We do have technikons and FET colleges that have a similar objective to the aforementi­oned apprentice­ships. But they have delivered a mixed bag in terms of producing students who can thereafter find jobs and start their own careers. Until we fix this, we are stuck with degrees as a measure of competence.

Too many unemployed graduates

Tertiary education is not the answer to all our employment problems and that is reflected in the number of unemployed graduates out there. This is another reason why corporates can't start dropping university qualificat­ions as a requiremen­t. We live in a country where more than a quarter of the population is unemployed. Youth unemployme­nt, according to Stats SA, is at a whopping 38 percent, and that's the conservati­ve figure because it doesn't take into account the people that have given up looking for work.

There are non-profit organisati­ons like YES and the Harambe Youth Employment Accelerato­r that, with the assistance of the government, are actively trying to address this issue by equipping young people with soft skills and work experience but the unemployme­nt problem is an insurmount­able mountain to climb.

Switching careers is a different story

For those who have extensive experience in a particular area, yes that experience is more valuable than a qualificat­ion. But that experience only qualifies you for that specific competence. People should not be expecting to be hired into profession­s and roles that they have no experience in by virtue of past performanc­e in a different role. If you come to me to tell me that you have 15 years' experience as a process engineer, for example, but you want to come to join a bank in a different capacity, I am going to need proof of your ability to deliver in that field of expertise and you will need a qualificat­ion for that. You might be the best process engineer one has ever seen, but you might struggle as a stockbroke­r, for example. Your experience as a process engineer at whichever company you are currently with is not always useful if that's not the role for which you are applying.

“If you look at the quality of matriculan­ts in this country right now, we cannot say that those young people are at all ready to engage in the corporate world…”

However, if you want to change roles within your existing company, that's an easier thing to do because the company is aware of your work ethic and is able to refer to the value you have delivered as a process engineer and will thus have a reliable data point to refer to in order to justify placing you in a role for which you do not have the requisite qualificat­ion.

That is why my advice to anybody who is looking to learn new skills, or gain experience in a different role, try get that experience from your current company as they are more likely to give you that opportunit­y and bear with you as you find your feet. 

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa