Daily Dispatch

‘Blacklist’ the corrupt firms

Collusion theft, says business body

- By MARK ALLIX

THE Black Business Council in the Built Environmen­t (BBCBE) says that R1.46-billion of fines imposed by the Competitio­n Commission on 15 listed and unlisted companies in the constructi­on sector for anti-competitiv­e behaviour is a “mere slap on the wrist”.

It says the firms‚ including South Africa’s top constructi­on groups‚ should be blackliste­d from public sector constructi­on projects‚ having “favoured certain groups of South Africans to the exclusion of others”.

“These companies have effectivel­y stolen money from the. . . fiscus and should be treated as criminals.”

It said the blacklisti­ng of these companies would not negatively affect the constructi­on industry’s capacity to deliver on the government’s R4-trillion infrastruc­ture developmen­t programme. This would “naturally gravitate towards companies that will be awarded contracts going forward”‚ with support from banks and suppliers of constructi­on materials.

“We urge the Hawks to investigat­e and prosecute individual­s that were responsibl­e for running the so-called ‘party’,” the BBCBE said.

“The Party” refers to individual­s and groups the Competitio­n Commission said were party to past collusive behaviour.

“These people must be held personally responsibl­e for their actions and they must be arrested and prosecuted like any other criminal involved in fraud and corrupt activities‚” the BBCBE said.

Collusion in the constructi­on industry had diverted funds that would have been better used for service delivery. Instead, these funds had “made the rich richer”.

To this end‚ the council would request the National Treasury to ringfence money paid for the fines and channel it to both the National Empowermen­t Fund and the Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n to help emerging firms.

The BBCBE also said it was seeking legal advice to bring a possible class action lawsuit against those found guilty. This it would do on behalf of its members and other companies that suffered financiall­y because of the actions of the parties guilty of collusion.

Further‚ the body said it expected the Constructi­on Industry Developmen­t Board (CIDB) and the National Home Builders Regulation Council to act against these companies.

The comments came as the CIDB on Tuesday welcomed the Competitio­n Commission settlement. Acting CIDB chief executive Hlengiwe Khumalo said that collusive practices were exclusiona­ry and undermined socioecono­mic developmen­t and the transforma­tion that was necessary in the constructi­on industry.

“This paves the way for the CIDB to initiate its own process of investigat­ion and inquiry into the firms’ conduct‚ in terms of (constructi­on industry) regulation­s,” Khumalo said. But it was waiting for the report of the commission and decisions of the Competitio­n Tribunal‚ which were “crucial and pivotal” to its investigat­ion.

Meanwhile‚ Business Unity South Africa (Busa) said on Tuesday it “deplored” any collusive activity that had a negative effect on the country’s economy. A competitiv­e economy was likely to create more jobs in the medium term.

“We also want an open economy that encourages fair participat­ion and entry of emerging businesses‚” Busa chief executive Nomaxabiso Majokweni said.

“In order to promote a culture of integrity and ethical conduct‚ Busa has developed an integrity pact‚ especially for applicatio­n in infrastruc­ture projects.” — BDLive

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa