The SACP has reduced itself to a lobby group securing patronage for its officials. Principles have been forfeited, says
They were not entirely convinced that the United Democratic Front (UDF) and the exiled liberation movement had workers’ interests at heart, suspecting them of harbouring bourgeois inclinations.
Populists countered that political involvement was inescapable in light of the repressive nature of the South African state.
In addition to exploitation, blacks also encountered racism that could only be eliminated through national liberation.
Cosatu’s formation and the subsequent alliance with the UDF, coupled with its adoption of the ANC’s Freedom Charter, was an uneasy compromise. It was necessitated by the paramountcy of achieving unity amongst workers in order to attain a national democratic breakthrough. Eliminating racism, it was also argued, would create favourable conditions to address the plight of workers.
But, the sincerity of the ANC towards a working class agenda remained suspect, especially in Numsa’s eyes. And, Numsa considers what has been happening in the last 20 years a validation of that suspicion.
South Africa suffers a massive unemployment rate and wages are painfully low whilst and management earns massive salaries.
The black middle- and upper classes have consequently grown tremendously widening existing inequality not only across races, but within the black community.
To Numsa the current dispensation has entrenched capitalism, which they consider the source of their misery. They want to march on straight to socialism, to build socialism now!
Numsa’s clamour is not peculiar. That’s what the SACP promised workers. The party had also started off being suspicious of the ANC. In fact, it was the first to raise such suspicion back in the 1920s, but eventually settled on what it called a two-stage revolution theory.
National liberation first, then a forward march towards socialism.
Numsa bought the theory after some persuasion, following its formation in the 1980s.
They were also partly persuaded by the ANC’s flirtation with socialism. It had declared itself a “disciplined force of the left”, completely different from standard nationalist movements which are prone to a bourgeois orientation.
In other words, the proposed formation of the United Front is an indictment on the SACP. The ANC can be forgiven. They’re a multiclass coalition by nature, however much they may pretend to be something else. This showed even before the party came to power. It promised redress to the aspirant black business, just as it did to the exploited black workers.
But, the SACP kept the faith, persisting with the promise to march on towards socialism after the democratic breakthrough.
Their confrontation and subsequent fall-out with Thabo Mbeki’s administration was supposedly a result of that pursuit. Mbeki dismissed them as pseudo marxists.
But that never derailed the communists. They continued to assail Mbeki’s pro-market policies as a betrayal of the working people. Not only were they critics, but they also led the successful campaign to remove Mbeki from office.
Mbeki’s removal was supposedly a fatal blow against capital. He had been, at least according to the party, an instrument of capital. Now the path to socialism was supposedly a lot clearer. But, there hasn’t been much movement since then.
Instead of progress, the party has itself changed. Whereas in the past office-bearers of the party resisted joining government, choosing to build the working class instead, now they’re part of the state.
This is rife throughout all spheres of government.
The party’s constitution even had to be changed to facilitate this cooption into government.
Now that most party officials are ensconced within corridors of power, they are no longer vocal critics of government. Yet, this administration is not discernibly different to that of its predecessor, which they lambasted ferociously. In fact, Zwelinzima Vavi has likened this administration to a pack of hyenas, calling it a predatory elite.
Rather than criticise, the party has been promoting use of neo-traditional language in public discourse.
Citizens are told to refer to the president of the republic as “baba” – father.
This term is quite suitable for a private space, but wholly inappropriate in the public domain. It invokes a hierarchical relationship – between a senior and a subordinate, or father and child – something that is inconsistent with the democratic principle of a sovereign electorate, to which the executive accounts.
The SACP has reduced itself to a lobby group that secures patronage for its officials. Principles have consequently been forfeited.
Consider its contradictory posture towards the findings of the Office of the Public Protector. It rejects those findings on Nkandla, but insists that the SABC implements Thuli Madonsela’s recommendations in relation to Hlaudi Motsoeneng.
In their violent denunciation of the Nkandla report, they’ve challenged the very legitimacy of the institution, labelling Madonsela part of the “anti-majoritarian force”.
But all this vitriol is forgotten in relation to findings on the SABC where they’re unrelenting that the broadcaster must respect Madonsela.
Personal pursuits have come to masquerade as revolutionary interests. Umqol’ uphandle! (the mask has fallen off). The proposed workers’ party is a logical consequence of the moment, spurred both by selfinterest and history.