Private prosecutions plan poses serious hurdles for AfriForum

DID you suffer by the action you want to prosecute? Do you have cash for a prosecution?

The resignation of ace prosecutor Gerrie Nel from the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to head the private prosecutions team at AfriForum poses serious hurdles for the organisation.

While a number of political parties and lobby groups – such as Helen Suzman Foundation and Freedom Under Law – have been able to go to courts to challenge decisions taken by the executive‚ these cases were dealt with under the auspices of the civil courts.

Courts have said that these organisations promote accountability and advance respect for the rule of law.

By contrast‚ prosecutions remain the preserve of the NPA‚ unless the NPA refuses to prosecute.

The Criminal Procedure Act sets stringent requirements before a private prosecution can begin.

Firstly‚ the law states a private person may institute and conduct a prosecution in respect of an offence if the director of public prosecutions declines to prosecute.

However‚ the law limits the people who can launch and conduct a private prosecution.

These include any private person who can prove some peculiar and substantial interest in the issue of the trial arising out of some injury which the person individually suffered.

They also include a husband if the offence was committed in respect of his wife.

The wife or child or‚ if there is no wife or child‚ any of the next of kin of any deceased person may launch a private prosecution if the death of such a person is alleged to have been caused by the said offence.

The cases that had been suggested AfriForum would prosecute include those involving acting police commissioner Khomotso Phahlane‚ Hawks head Berning Ntlemeza and SA Airways board chair Dudu Myeni.

However‚ the main hurdle for the private prosecution of these cases will be for the individuals in these cases to show some injury which they had personally suffered as a result of that offence.

Most of the cases‚ such as last year’s EFF Constitutional Court challenge against President Jacob Zuma’s refusal to obey the Constitution‚ were not focused on an injury suffered by the party. The case focused on the lawfulness of the president’s action.

That is the same with the application by the DA last year‚ which successfully set aside the NPA’s decision to discontinue the prosecution of Zuma.

The requirements of a private prosecution do not end there.

The law also requires the private prosecutor not to issue any process unless he deposits with the magistrate’s court money as security that he will prosecute the charge against the accused to the conclusion without delay.

If the accused is not happy with the amount‚ he could require the prosecutor to deposit an additional amount.

The law also states that where the charge against the accused is dismissed or the accused is acq the court may order the private prosecutor to pay to the accused the whole or part of any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution.