Daily Dispatch

Proposed male circumcisi­on ban causes uproar in Iceland

- By JAMES ROTHWELL Group Telegraph Media

ON A chilly afternoon in Reykjavik, rabbis and imams from across Europe have packed themselves into a stuffy conference centre beneath snow-capped mountains.

“I say to my respected friends in Iceland, please never send the signal that Jews are not welcome in this country,” says Jonathan Arkush, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, as several in the audience nod their heads.

“What you are engaged in is a sort of secularist fundamenta­lism, which is a fundamenta­lly illiberal thing for a Western democracy to do,” he continues, staring at a tall, bespectacl­ed politician sitting in the front row.

The man who has drawn his ire is Lafur ór Gunnarsson, an Icelandic MP who is at the centre of a global outcry after he proposed a bill to ban the ritual circumcisi­on of children. If passed, the bill would be the first of its kind in Europe and could see parents who have their children circumcise­d sent to prison for up to six years.

The debate over circumcisi­on is growing in Europe, with Denmark considerin­g a similar proposal, which worries Jewish and Muslim communitie­s. It also is being watched closely in the UK, where campaigner­s hope British doctors will follow Iceland’s lead.

Men Do Complain, one such British group, says the procedure is “without doubt” an infringeme­nt of children’s rights, as “there is no disease being cured, so it is a complete breach of medical ethics”.

Around one in three men worldwide are circumcise­d, with most Jewish children undergoing the procedure within a few days of being born. In Muslim communitie­s, boys are often circumcise­d before they reach seven. But the ancient practice is virtually alien to Iceland’s homogeneou­s population, which includes only 3 000 Muslims and just 35 Jews.

“We see this as a human rights issue,” says Dr Gunnarsson. “Does a covenant with God trump a child’s right to bodily integrity? I’m not sure. I don’t think so.”

But beyond Iceland, Muslim and Jewish groups in Europe and America are worried. Leaders from other faiths have also stepped in, with Cardinal Reinhard Marx, one of the most senior Catholic figures in Europe, branding the bill a “dangerous attack” on religious freedom. Polls suggest around 50% of Icelanders support the ban.

At the conference, the atmosphere is civil but tense as one religious leader after another explains to sceptical Icelanders why it is integral to their beliefs. Ahmad Seddeeq, a local imam, compares the procedure to piercing a child’s ears or removing their tonsils.

Then, as Gunnarsson listens intently, a spokesman for the Islamic Foundation of Iceland says the ban may affect a growing number of Muslim asylum seekers, who could not send their children back to Iraq or Syria for the procedure if it is outlawed.

But not everyone seems to agree with these arguments. Intact Iceland, a pressure group in favour of the ban, considers circumcisi­on without consent child abuse.

“We have one mission only, which is to advocate for the right of the child not to be circumcise­d as they would have to live with consequenc­es for the rest of their lives that they did not choose themselves,” says Sveinn Svavarsson, the group’s spokesman.

Ironically, as Iceland grapples with the suggestion that circumcisi­on amounts to child abuse, the country is about to welcome its first rabbi, Avi Feldman. “Circumcisi­on serves as the bedrock of Jewish life,” he said. “For those who value religious freedom, the proposed ban is naturally a matter of great concern.”

If nothing else, the bill has brought about an unpreceden­ted level of solidarity among Icelandic religious groups, according to Father Jakob Rolland, a Catholic priest who organised the conference. Though they do not unanimousl­y oppose the bill – some members of Iceland’s Viking religion are in favour – they have all vowed to speak up on behalf of Jews and Muslims for religious freedom.

Whether they will succeed in amending the bill, or sinking it altogether, remains unclear. It is currently at committee stage, to soon be debated in the Icelandic parliament. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa