THROWING STONES IN A GLASS HOUSE

No proof immigrants are causing SA’s social and economic woes, argues Steven Gordon.

Mobs have attacked foreignowned businesses on the streets of at least three South African cities in recent days.

This has caused outrage across Africa. There have even been retaliatory attacks. The government, under pressure to protect SA’s large international migrant community, quickly defused the attacks.

Such attacks are not new. For more than two decades, this type of crime has bedeviled the country. There is growing frustration that so little has been done to stop it.

To combat anti-immigrant hate crime, we need to under stand its drivers. Scholars at the Human Sciences Research Council have recently made new discoveries in this regard.

We found a significant share of the population hold antiimmigrant views and blame foreign nationals for many of the socio-economic challenges facing SA society.

There is little empirical evidence that immigrants are driving problems like crime or unemployment.

But beliefs about the role played by foreign nationals in the country clearly influence how people think about antiimmigrant hate crime. Anti-immigrant statements by politicians feed into the problem.

Data from the South African Social Attitudes Survey, conducted annually since 2003, was used. The survey series consists of nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional surveys.

It is designed as a time series and is increasingly providing a unique, long-term account of the speed and direction of change of public participation in anti-immigrant behaviour in contemporary SA.

Using this data, researchers have found that anti-immigrant hate crime is more widespread than previously thought.

Beginning in 2015, this item was added to the questionnaire: Have you taken part in violent action to prevent immigrants from living or working in your neighbourhood?

A minority of the SA adult population reported that they had participated in this form of anti-immigrant aggression.

The share of the general public who admitted engaging in violence fluctuated within a very narrow band over the period 2015-2018.

This shows the willingness to respond to this question varies by only a small margin between the two periods.

It also suggests a linear relationship between behavioural intention and attitudes.

The survey results demonstrate the ugly reality of violent anti-immigrant hate crime in SA. Although this is an important and dangerous type of prejudice, such crime is not the only form that xenophobia may take. Other forms of peaceful anti-immigrant discrimination are also evident in SA society. Research has shown that more peaceful forms of anti-immigrant activities are often the first step in a process of escalation that leads to xenophobic violence. Past participation in peaceful antiimmigrant activity (such as demonstrations) was found to be a major determinant of this type of violence.

For this reason, we suggest in our study, policymakers should consider non-violent anti-immigrant activities as early warning signs of forthcoming antiimmigrant hate crime.

One of the most troubling findings to have emerged concerned possible participation in anti-immigrant aggression among those who had not taken part before.

More than one in 10 adults living in SA reported in the 2018 survey that they had not taken part in violent action against foreign nationals – but would be prepared to do so.

This finding is quite disturbing given that there may be under-reporting of the propensity for violent action.

Anti-immigrant stereotypes were shown to be a robust driver of this kind of behavioural intention. This suggests that anti-immigrant attitudes could have a mobilising effect, spurring individuals to acts of violent xenophobia.

The results of this study show that millions of ordinary South Africans are prepared to engage in anti-immigrant behaviour.

So it is vital that the resources dedicated to combating xenophobia be equal to the size of the problem.

The SA government has a national action plan to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. The progressive measures put forward in the plan include immigrant integration, better law enforcement, civic education and increased immigrant access to constitutionally entitled rights.

Recent research suggests that many of these measures have a degree of public support.

The plan was approved in March. If it is to work, it requires adequate resources and support from all sectors of SA society.

Instead of focusing on shortterm solutions civil society, foreign governments and the general public must work with the state to progressively implement this plan.

This article first appeared in The

Conversation. Steven Gordon is a senior research specialist for the Human Sciences Research Council.

Millions of South Africans are prepared to engage in anti-immigrant behaviour