Daily Dispatch

Midwife crisis: a cold war with obstetrici­ans is born

Up to 75% of births in the private sector are via surgery, while no more than 15% are medically justified, but doctors say they cannot afford any risks

-

Overdue by just a week, Theresa Sparks had to be induced as her first pregnancy was considered to be entering a high-risk stage.

After 27 hours in labour, she was rushed into theatre for an emergency C-section after her baby boy became distressed.

“It was not what I expected, as I was so eager to have a vaginal birth. But obviously the health of my son, Theodore, took priority, and I had to stop thinking about what I wanted. He came out just fine at the end.”

Three years later, she was still adamant about having a natural birth with her second child.

After 37 hours in labour, her 4kg baby girl, Celia, was born in a Cape Town private hospital at just more than 40 weeks.

This time around, her wishes had come true and her baby was delivered by a midwife.

“It was the most beautiful experience of my life. I felt such a great sense of achievemen­t. This time around I birthed my baby unmedicate­d. She wasn’t taken out of me.”

But the Pinelands mother worries that the “safest way to birth for low-risk pregnancie­s” may soon become unavailabl­e in the private healthcare sector.

Some private midwives claim obstetrici­ans are reluctant to support them during high-risk pregnancie­s.

To avoid midwifery-supported birth becoming extinct, a new movement called Right to Birth SA was launched in Cape Town on Friday.

The group claims that in Cape Town, for instance, many private hospitals are no longer using midwives because many obstetrici­ans view their practice as a high risk for litigation.

Glynnis Garrod, founder of private midwifery clinic Birth Options, said several factors were at play in the cold war between obstetrici­ans and midwives. “The potential lack of choice is now very real for many women. Women should have the right to choose,” she said.

But obstetrici­ans have defended their stance, saying natural births had become “too risky”, and if anything were to go wrong the doctor, and not the midwife, would be held responsibl­e.

Dr Peter de Jong, an obstetrici­an and gynaecolog­ist at Christiaan Barnard Hospital in Cape Town, said on average obstetrici­ans paid about R1.3m a year in risk-cover premiums. He said lawyers often targeted vaginal births when suing doctors, as they regarded those as “high risk”.

“Unfortunat­ely obstetrics is fraught with medico-legal complicati­ons. In a case where delivery goes wrong, an obstetrici­an, who has an unlimited risk insurance cover, is more likely to be sued than a midwife. While obstetrici­ans don’t necessaril­y have any issues with midwives, it’s just not worth the risk in the end,” he said.

He said some of the risks associated with natural births included infection, allergic reaction, episiotomy, instrument­al trauma to the perineum, scarring, uterine rupture and sexual dysfunctio­n.

Garrod said Constantia­berg Mediclinic was the latest private hospital in Cape Town to show reluctance towards backing midwives, as it insisted on having at least two obstetrici­ans to back up midwives.

In November she was quoted by Times Select as saying midwives were “devastated and deeply saddened” after the withdrawal of obstetric backup by the obstetrici­ans at Vincent Pallotti Hospital in Cape Town.

She said midwives were never involved in the discussion­s other than rising insurance costs and “needing the support of all the obstetrici­ans in order to make an on-call rotation work”.

Medical schemes were also not making the situation any easier, with some major players such as Discovery Health accused of not covering midwifery fees in full.

Discovery Health has, however, denied this.

Dr Noluthando Nematswera­ni, head of the clinical policy unit for Discovery Health, said: “Depending on the member’s chosen plan we cover all in-hospital healthcare services up to 300%.

“Where members obtain services from healthcare providers who don’t have an agreement, which may include midwives or obstetrici­ans, and the provider charges in excess of the members’ chosen cover rate, the member will be liable for the cost difference,” she said.

Dr Estelle Coustas, nursing executive at Mediclinic SA, said the hospital group had “engaged extensivel­y” with midwives to accommodat­e them at Constantia­berg and had proposed a service-level agreement.

“It is unreasonab­le to expect a single obstetrici­an to be available 24/7 and, as a result, the private midwives were requested, as part of the agreement, to identify two obstetrici­ans to support their services within the hospital, providing clinical cover for each other. To date, Mediclinic has not received the commitment from a second obstetrici­an,” she said.

“Mediclinic will continue to engage with all parties to seek a solution that ensures the safety of patients.”

The annual Council of Medical Schemes report released on Friday shows the C-section admissions had increased by 5.1% from 2017 to 2018, with 75% of births being done through surgery.

“Caesarean births in medical schemes are more than three times higher than in the public sector and out of sync with some highly developed countries,” the CMS said.

The World Health Organisati­on is of the view that only between 10% and 15% of Caesarian births are medically justified.

The average amount paid to hospitals (excluding doctors’ fees) for a C-section birth in 2018 was R40,100.

Dr Anchen Laubscher, medical director at Netcare, said the hospital group had partnered with a private midwifery unit, The Birthing Team.

This was to preserve midwifery services “to provide the communitie­s we serve with the most accessible and effective care possible in maternity services”.

“This service expands the maternity care options available to expectant mothers, including those who do not have medical aid and those with contracted health insurance plans,” she said. – Times Select

 ?? Picture: 123rf ??
Picture: 123rf
 ?? Picture: SIPOKAZI FOKAZI ?? WOMEN’S RIGHTS: Emma Graham holds her daughter, Isla, with Susan Lees, a midwife who was one of the women who attended the launch of a pro-natural Right to Birth movement. Obstetrici­ans are increasing­ly pushing for C-sections because they say if anything goes wrong, it is they who are held liable, not midwives.
Picture: SIPOKAZI FOKAZI WOMEN’S RIGHTS: Emma Graham holds her daughter, Isla, with Susan Lees, a midwife who was one of the women who attended the launch of a pro-natural Right to Birth movement. Obstetrici­ans are increasing­ly pushing for C-sections because they say if anything goes wrong, it is they who are held liable, not midwives.
 ?? Picture: SIPOKAZI FOKAZI ?? RIGHT TO CHOOSE: Theresa Sparks, who had both C-section and natural births, says she felt empowered by being offered the option on how she wanted to give birth and that natural birth had given her a sense of achievemen­t. In Sparks’s case, her C-section was medically necessary, but that is not the case in many such births.
Picture: SIPOKAZI FOKAZI RIGHT TO CHOOSE: Theresa Sparks, who had both C-section and natural births, says she felt empowered by being offered the option on how she wanted to give birth and that natural birth had given her a sense of achievemen­t. In Sparks’s case, her C-section was medically necessary, but that is not the case in many such births.
 ?? Picture: CAITLIN FAY SMIT ?? TAKING ON THE INDUSTRY: Glynnys Garrod, founder of Birth Options, is spearheadi­ng the fight against the potential demise of midwifery in South Africa. Garrod has taken issue with medical aid schemes that do not cover the cost of midwives’ services, saying that mothers have the right to choose how they deliver their babies.
Picture: CAITLIN FAY SMIT TAKING ON THE INDUSTRY: Glynnys Garrod, founder of Birth Options, is spearheadi­ng the fight against the potential demise of midwifery in South Africa. Garrod has taken issue with medical aid schemes that do not cover the cost of midwives’ services, saying that mothers have the right to choose how they deliver their babies.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa