Daily Dispatch

Undertaker­s call for full shutdown

Over 3,000 funeral parlours may withdraw corpse removal services

- BONGANI FUZILE, MFUNDO PILISO, IAVAN PIJOOS and PROMISE MARUPENG

Thousands of undertaker­s have called for a nationwide shutdown of all funeral parlours on Monday, but the sector is divided over the move.

A unificatio­n task team formed by undertaker forums and other formations said there would be demonstrat­ions in all public facilities and mortuaries nationwide by more than 3,000 participat­ing members.

It has a list of demands for the health, home affairs and environmen­tal affairs department­s.

National Funeral Practition­ers Associatio­n of SA president Muzi Hlengwa said there would be no removal of bodies from hospitals or homes, no burials and no funeral supplies.

Hlengwa said the funeral industry had been “reasonably patient” with the government, but had now lost patience with nothing but “empty promises. We need transforma­tion in this industry and we need it now.”

As well as transforma­tion, the task team is demanding the amendment of municipal bylaws to accommodat­e the building of bulk, cluster or complex storages, the allocation by the government of a Covid-19 relief fund for the funeral industry with immediate effect, and it wants undertaker­s to claim from and be paid directly by the Road Accident Fund using a cession agreement.

Said Hlengwa: “We want the tender system abolished in the funeral industry, to allow families their constituti­onal right to appoint their preferred service provider.

“Where there are no families to choose a service provider, a rotation database should be applied — no tenders,” he said.

Health department spokespers­on Popo Maja said health facilities did not release human remains to private undertaker­s unless they produced a certificat­e of competence.

“Recently, there have been reports of challenges in relation to removal and collection of human remains from health facilities to private mortuaries or funeral undertaker­s’ premises by private funeral undertaker­s and agents,” he said.

Maja said the regulation­s forbade anyone from preparing or storing remains except on approved undertaker­s’ premises or mortuaries, and this involved a certificat­e of competence issued by the local authority.

“District and metropolit­an municipali­ties, through their municipal health services units, have powers to monitor compliance of mortuaries and funeral undertaker­s’ premises with the regulation­s and ensure possession of a certificat­e of competence for protection of public health,” Maja said.

“We cannot say with certainty what will be the implicatio­ns of the threatened strike. Anyone who obstructs public officials performing their duties will be dealt with within relevant laws of the country.”

The owner of an East London funeral supplier, who is not being named for his own safety, said his company would operate, but as a precaution­ary measure all its cars had been parked in a safe place. This follows rumours that those who refused to strike would find their cars damaged.

“I belong to the SA Funeral Practition­ers Associatio­n and our organisati­on has resolved not to strike. I’m bound by any decision they make,” he said.

“I have retrieved all my vehicles because when people strike they damage property. There was a video circulated on social media saying if a hearse was seen operating it would be burnt. It was hard work to build this business, just to lose assets in this way.”

The Funeral Federation of SA, which represents nine other associatio­ns, issued a statement saying they would not support the shutdown.

They said their decision was based on the fact that they were an essential service and assisted the public in times of need.

“Having said this, we acknowledg­e that the list of demands that have been put forward are reasonable. We believe these demands should be addressed by government. We further acknowledg­e that the industry needs to be properly regulated,” the statement says.

It was unfortunat­e the government was “sometimes hard of hearing”, it added.

“It is our view that this is a government that the majority of South Africans have voted for and that there should be no need to shut down anything, if only there was constructi­ve engagement between the industry and the various government department­s that impact on us.”

Amagasela Funeral Parlour supervisor Lwazi Tuwe confirmed they were aware of the shutdown, but said he did not have many details. Tuwe said Amagasela’s actions would be guided by those of their competitor­s in the industry.

“We know that the strike has its own rules and we would not want our business’s assets to be damaged by our colleagues because we were operating during strike action. So if the strike takes place on Monday, we will join the strike,” said Tuwe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa