Daily Maverick

Disappoint­ment

Wording of the final decisons. By

- Ethan van Diemen

Despite Africa being home to many of the countries vulnerable to the impacts that come from burning fossil fuels, Africa was only mentioned twice in the cover decision text of what was billed as an “African COP”.

While this “African COP” could not achieve a consensus on ending the use of fossil fuels that are the cause of the human-induced climate change that bedevils the continent more than any other, there was a substantia­l breakthrou­gh in addressing the downstream impacts of those pollutants, which was largely well received.

Important step for climate justice

Negotiator­s at Sharm el-Sheikh did the nearly impossible, delivering on a 30-yearold goal to establish a financial mechanism to support victims of climate impacts.

previously reported that government­s from more than 190 countries agreed to set up a fund dedicated to addressing “loss and damage” in 2023.

Loss and damage, in short, refer to the damage done by human-induced climate change that occurs beyond the adaptive capacity of countries. These countries are usually the poorest and least developed, and have contribute­d the least to the emissions that have caused the impacts of which they are today the greatest victims.

Alpha Oumar Kaloga, the regional adviser for the Africa Country Programme Division at the Green Climate Fund and lead negotiator for the Africa Group at COP27, called the agreement a “unique moment” and “a win for all citizens of the world”.

Ani Dasgupta, the president and CEO of the World Resources Institute, said: “In a historic breakthrou­gh, wealthy nations have finally agreed to create a fund to aid vulnerable countries that are reeling from devastatin­g climate damages.

“This loss and damage fund will be a lifeline for poor families whose houses are destroyed, farmers whose fields are ruined, and islanders forced from their ancestral homes…”

Dasgupta added: “While progress on loss and damage was encouragin­g, it is disappoint­ing that the decision mostly copied and pasted language from Glasgow about curbing emissions.”

Away from the main points of contention that soaked up all the attention, there was notable progress and movement elsewhere.

News you may have missed

Carbon Brief, in a deep analysis of the entire conference, notes that for the first time, a “COP cover decision mentioned food, rivers, nature-based solutions, tipping points and the right to a healthy environmen­t”.

In news particular­ly relevant to South Africans, the Just Energy Transition Partnershi­p model, first launched in 2021 to wean developing countries off their fossil fuel dependency, was emphasised in the Sharm el-Sheikh Implementa­tion Plan as one of many “cooperativ­e actions” countries should look to as they seek to reduce their emissions.

“There is reason for hope after government­s came together to protect the more than 3.3 billion people living in areas highly vulnerable to climate change,” said

Dasgupta.

“Time is running short, but a livable planet for people and nature is still within our grasp if leaders take bolder action this decisive decade.”

 ?? ?? An activist portrays an aquatic Mother Nature to draw attention to the pollution of water resources around the world at COP27. Photo: Seedat Suna/EPA-EFE
An activist portrays an aquatic Mother Nature to draw attention to the pollution of water resources around the world at COP27. Photo: Seedat Suna/EPA-EFE
 ?? ?? A member of Indigenous Women Defenders of the Amazon makes a point at COP27.
Photo: Seedat Suna/EPA-EFE
A member of Indigenous Women Defenders of the Amazon makes a point at COP27. Photo: Seedat Suna/EPA-EFE
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa