Daily Maverick

The Kruger National Park is bleeding rhinos

The world’s greatest refuge for rhinos is losing them to poaching faster than they’re being born. In the last 13 years rhino numbers have dropped from 11,420 to 2,458. The park’s last rhino may already have been born. It’s time to declare an emergency.

- By Don Pinnock

Under the heading Progress, the 2021/22 SANParks annual report has a deeply disturbing and immensely sad target claimed as a success: only 195 rhinos were killed by poachers during 2021 – an average of one every two days. The success, it seems, is that the previous year it was one rhino every 36 hours.

In its reports and pronouncem­ents, SANParks acknowledg­es poaching problems, but the overall tone is “don’t panic, we’ve got it under control”. They haven’t. Kruger is bleeding rhinos and is in need of sutures – fast.

The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environmen­t has disclosed that in the first six months of this year, 82 rhinos were killed in the park. If the trend continues, the year will end up with a kill rate equal to that of 2021.

The truth is that unless Kruger does something fast, rhinos could go extinct in the park within four years. That’s far shorter than the life span of most rhinos in Kruger.

Since 2009 – just 13 years – rhino numbers have dropped from 11,420 to 2,458 and this year they will continue to drop. During that time, the number of rhinos poached was double the existing population.

The cumulative numbers are shocking. There’s a good chance that Kruger rhinos are on the way to becoming functional­ly extinct.

Where do the problems lie?

What will it take to bend the curve upwards away from zero? The answer can only come from understand­ing the reasons for the decline.

SANParks will point to forces beyond their control – and they are considerab­le.

Like a snake eating its own tail, the problem begins and ends with a seemingly insatiable appetite in Asia for rhino horn, which is seen as both a status symbol and a cure for various ailments (it isn’t).

This has led to a situation where internatio­nal crime syndicates supply weapons and logistics to local middlemen who induce impoverish­ed young men in communitie­s on both sides of the park to poach rhinos.

The park is sandwiched between millions of mostly poor people – Mozambican and South African – with few prospects for employment. It’s fertile ground for poacher recruitmen­t.

Kruger Park also has unfenced borders with a parallel park in Mozambique, but rangers following poachers cannot cross the line.

In his book Rhino War, written with Tony Park, General Johan Jooste – who was Kruger’s head ranger from 2013 to 2016 – was told by a ranger: “They laughed at us, General. As soon as they crossed the border they stopped and started waving at us, yelling insults. They know we cannot chase after them.”

These issues alone, however, cannot be the sole reason for the precipitou­s decline of rhinos. There are serious internal problems as well, mostly, says Jooste, to do with ability, capacity, integrity and vision.

Buffett’s cancellati­on

A retired military officer, Jooste was brought in as head ranger in 2013 as rhino poaching began escalating. Donations formed the backbone of his developmen­t strategy, and with them he created a highly trained paramilita­ry force out of the ranger corps. He also brought in hi-tech surveillan­ce equipment.

Jooste negotiated a R225-million anti-poaching grant from billionair­e Howard Buffett, using it to create an efficient joint command centre to gather and coordinate intelligen­ce against poachers.

Then, in 2016, Buffett cancelled more than half of the grant, citing the absence of a reporting structure with clearly defined roles and lack of internal capacity for project management. Millions were wasted on internal inquiries into this loss.

The intensive protection zones for rhinos – set up by Jooste during his tenure and funded by Buffett – started coming apart after his departure. They did so, he says, because Kruger and ranger leadership failed “to carry them through and find a way to make them work or come up with workable alternativ­es”.

It was an “abdication of duty and lack of courage”.

Buffett’s donation had been received with great fanfare, but evidently not universall­y within SANParks’ executive ranks.

Buffett’s generosity was based on his personal regard for Jooste and, according to

Rhino War, this rankled with those who didn’t appreciate being beholden to a rich American who had made it clear that his largesse would only be in place as long as Jooste – the white ex-apartheid general – remained at the helm.

Integrity testing

Jooste resigned under circumstan­ces he is not willing to discuss. He alludes to “problems”. The park clearly lost not only necessary funding but also a key strategist in the rhino war. One of the problems, it seems, was integrity testing.

“Members of Exco feel you’re acting outside your mandate in pursuit of

corruption after integrity testing,” he was told. Integrity testing was the euphemism for the polygraph testing of Kruger staff. From the outset, Jooste had insisted on this interventi­on and was the first to subject himself to the process.

Integrity testing was not popular, but Jooste felt it was necessary. Poachers were paying some rangers to locate rhinos, and a few were even involved in actual poaching. These included Rodney Landela, who Jooste had promoted to regional ranger.

Unions were also opposed to polygraph testing and it was suspended during the Covid pandemic. SANParks has undertaken to renew it, but has as yet failed to do so. It is not known whether a proposal for integrity testing was finally submitted to the SANParks board in November.

In his book, Jooste says testing without steps being taken on the results is useless. While Kruger management knows that leaks on rhino locations are coming from staff, they seem to be dragging their heels on making integrity testing happen.

Ranger shortage

Kruger also has a ranger shortage. More than 80 posts were not filled this year despite a commitment to do so obtained by David Bryant of the DA.

They had not been filled for several years. SANParks explained the problem as a budget issue, despite millions being spent on anti-poaching initiative­s.

Stronghold­s

Beyond Kruger National Park, rhino conservati­on is another story and is in an intensive planning stage. Although the park has the largest single population of black and white rhinos, about 60% of the national species are in private hands and many others are in national and provincial parks other than Kruger.

According to SANParks’ annual report, stronghold­s beyond Kruger are being constructe­d, though it doesn’t say how advanced this is or quite how this programme will work. It’s clearly not in the interests of rhino safety to say where they are or will be.

There will be pushback from conservati­onists. They point out that placing rhinos in private hands has led to the crisis of rhino farming for their horns, which keep “leaking” on to the black market. This fuels both Asian demand and poaching. There’s a fine line between conservati­on and commercial­isation.

In Rhino War, Jooste writes of Kruger: “A decade into the rhino campaign, my overwhelmi­ng realisatio­n is that we cannot afford another 10 years like this, even with our successes. We must avoid another ‘runaway train’ situation at all costs.”

If the statistics are anything to go by, that train without brakes has already left the Kruger Park station.

 ?? ?? Image sources: iStock
Image sources: iStock
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa