Immigration law anger spreads
LGBT advocates afraid
LEGAL challenges to President Donald Trump’s first moves on immigration spread yesterday, with three states suing over his executive order banning travel into the US by citizens of seven majorityMuslim countries.
Massachusetts, New York, Virginia and Washington state joined the legal battle against the travel ban, which the White House deems necessary to improve national security.
The challenges contend the order violated the US Constitution’s guarantees of religious freedom.
San Francisco became the first US city to sue to challenge a Trump directive to withhold federal money from US cities that have adopted sanctuary policies toward undocumented immigrants, which local officials argue help local police by making those immigrants more willing to report crimes.
The legal manoeuvres were the latest acts of defiance against executive orders signed by Trump last week that sparked protests in major US cities.
Both policies are in line with campaign promises by Republican businessman-turned-politician Trump, who vowed to build a wall on the Mexican border to stop illegal immigration and to take hard-line steps to prevent terrorist attacks in the US.
The restrictions on the seven Muslim-majority countries and new limits on refugees have won the support of many Americans.
Massachusetts contended the restrictions ran foul of the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution, which prohibits religious preference. NEW YORK: Advocates said yesterday they were bracing for a Trump administration rollback of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights, despite a White House statement vowing to uphold protection for LGBT people in the workplace.
US President Donald Trump will continue to enforce a 2014 executive order by his Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, barring
“What this is about is a violation of the Constitution,” Massachusetts attorney-general Maura Healey said of the order halting travel by people with passports from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days. The order also barred resettlement of refugees for 120 days and indefinitely banned Syrian refugees.
“It discriminates against people because of their religion, it discriminates against people because of their country of origin,” Healey said.
Massachusetts will be backing a lawsuit filed over the weekend in Boston federal court by two Iranian men who teach at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth.
A federal judge blocked the government from expelling those men from the country and halted enforcement of the order for seven days, following similar but more limited moves in four other states.
The attorneys-general of New York and Virginia also discrimination against LGBT people working for federal contractors, the White House said.
“LGBTQ people must remain on guard for attacks,” said Sarah Kate Ellis, the president of the civil rights group GLAAD.
Some LGBT activists were abuzz over a draft of an anti-LGBT executive order that had leaked and was circulating, expecting Trump’s impending order to be unveiled tomorrow. – Reuters said their states were joining similar lawsuits.
“As we speak, there are students at our colleges and universities who are unable to return to Virginia,” Virginia attorney-general Mark Herring said.
On Monday, Washington became the first US state to have its attorney-general initiate a lawsuit against Trump to challenge the travel ban.
Multiple foreign nationals have also filed lawsuits challenging the ban. They included one filed in Colorado on Tuesday by a Libyan college student and two filed in Chicago, including one on behalf of an Iranian father of three children all living in Illinois.
Protests continued yesterday. A crowd of several thousand demonstrators gathered at the federal courthouse in Minneapolis, chanting “Hey, hey, ho, ho Muslim ban has got to go!”
Dozens of protesters chanted the same slogan at Los Angeles International Air- port, and more than 400 demonstrators gathered in downtown Miami to protest against the travel ban and Trump’s crackdown on sanctuary cities.
San Francisco City attorney Dennis Herrera filed suit over Trump’s order threatening to cut funds to cities with sanctuary policies, a move that could stop the flow of billions of dollars to major US population centres including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.
“If allowed to be implemented, this executive order would make our communities less safe. It would make our residents less prosperous, and it would split families,” Herrera said.
Sanctuary cities adopt policies that limit co-operation, such as refusing to comply with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer requests. Advocates of the policies say that, beyond helping police with crime reporting, they make undocumented immigrants more willing to serve as witnesses if they do not fear that contact with law enforcement will lead to their deportation.
The San Francisco and Massachusetts actions contend that Trump’s orders in question violate the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution, which states that powers not granted to the federal government should fall to the states.
Michael Hethmon, a senior counsel with the conservative Immigration Reform Law Institute in Washington, called the San Francisco lawsuit a “silly political gesture”, noting that prior federal court decisions made it clear that the US government “can prohibit a policy that essentially impedes legitimate federal programmes”. – Reuters