Daily News

Reserve Bank warning for public protector

- SIYABONGA MKHWANAZI

THE SA Reserve Bank has warned the Public Protector, Busisiwe Mkhwebane, that President Jacob Zuma did not have powers to re-open a completed probe by an investigat­ing agency.

This came yesterday, when the SARB launched another applicatio­n in the High Court against Mkhwebane over its failure to recover R1.125 billion.

Mkhwebane had said in her report in June she would ask the Special Investigat­ing Unit to recover the R1.125bn that the SARB had failed to recover from Absa. This related to the lifeboat given to Bankorp/Absa by the SARB in the 1990s.

However, in its applicatio­n yesterday, the Reserve Bank said Absa had paid back every cent.

This is the second applicatio­n by the SARB, after its first applicatio­n was heard in the High Court on Tuesday.

In the first applicatio­n, the SARB challenged Mkhwebane’s findings that its mandate be changed. Mkhwebane did not oppose this applicatio­n.

However, Mkhwebane is opposing the second applicatio­n – to recover the R1.125bn from Absa.

Head of legal services at the SARB, Johannes Jurgens de Jager, said Mkhwebane had no basis to ask the SIU to recover the funds.

He said former SIU head Willem Heath had conducted a probe in the 1990s on the matter, and handed the report to then President Thabo Mbeki.

De Jager described the remedial action by Mkhwebane as irrational.

“The remedial action… of the report requires the SIU to approach the president (Jacob Zuma) to re-open and amend the Heath Proclamati­on,” said De Jager.

“However, the president has no power under the SIU and Special Tribunals Act of 1996 to re-open a completed investi- gation,” he said.

He said once the SIU report had been submitted to the president, it was final.

“Once that step is taken, the investigat­ion authorised by the president is concluded,” he said.

“Once the SIU has conducted an investigat­ion and finally reported on it to the president, those parties affected by the investigat­ion are for purposes of finality and legal certainty entitled to rely on the fact that the matter is closed,” he said.

In the SIU report in the 1990s, it found if the SARB were to launch recoveries against Absa, the process would be lengthy and risky.

De Jager also attacked the CIEX report, which called for the government to recover the R1.125bn from Absa, saying it was flawed.

He described the report as a “bounty hunter’s tender”.

He said the firm was on a fishing expedition when it conducted an investigat­ion for the government on the Bankorp lifeboat, and made wild allegation­s against individual­s and entities.

De Jager also accused Mkhwebane of failing to give the SARB an opportunit­y to respond to her report when she released it in June.

He said they tried to get her to respond, but their attempts had failed.

Mkhwebane’s spokespers­on, Cleo Mosana, said the Public Protector would oppose this applicatio­n by the SARB.

 ??  ?? BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE
BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa