Daily News

Lockdown regulation­s declared unconstitu­tional

- SIHLE MAVUSO | Additonal reporting by Loyiso Sidimba

THE government must explain to South Africans, where to from here? This after the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria yesterday declared the Covid-19 regulation­s invalid.

In a surprise turn of events, Judge Norman Davis ruled in favour of an urgent applicatio­n by the Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) to have the regulation­s – promulgate­d in terms of the Disaster Management Act (DMA) as earlier announced by Co-operative Governance and Traditiona­l Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma – declared unconstitu­tional, unlawful and invalid.

The applicant argued that the DMA restrictio­ns were unlawful and unconstitu­tional because a state of emergency had not been declared where the government is permitted to infringe on the Bill of Rights.

Further in its applicatio­n, the LFN also wanted all gatherings that comply with the Regulation of Gatherings Act declared lawful and businesses, services and shops to be allowed to operate if they take reasonable precaution­s such as wearing masks, gloves and using hand sanitisers. In court papers, LFN president Reyno de Beer said although the government’s intentions were to protect citizens’ rights, its approach had thus far been irrational.

According to De Beer, the DMA regulation­s were enacted irrational­ly, improperly and without considerin­g their impact on rights being sacrificed compared to the rights the government claims it is protecting.

”We respectful­ly submit that the national State of Disaster, also known generally as the ‘lockdown’ amongst the population, declared by Dlamini Zuma in terms of the DMA was irrational and based on incorrect advice and/or reaction to unconfirme­d and/or otherwise unreliable internatio­nal and national medical and health results not taking our country’s unique socio-economic conditions into considerat­ion,” he said.

LFN further said that the limiting of gatherings of more than 50 people was in direct violation of existing legislatio­n and an attempt to prevent protests against the government for its declaratio­n of the State of Disaster.

The Hola Bon Renaissanc­e (HBR) Foundation which was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court) in the case, meanwhile asked for the Covid19 temporary relief announced by the government to continue for six months.

In his ruling which found that the regulation­s are invalid, Judge Davis said they (regulation­s) “appear, however, to not have been updated and neither do they specifical­ly provide for Covid-19, presumably due to the novelty thereof”.

Judge Davis added that because the government based its drafting of the regulation­s on the Internatio­nal Health Regulation­s Act, “It is therefore difficult to assess whether this act can adequately provide for the national executive to deal effectivel­y with the disaster”.

In his order, Davis highlighte­d that the declaratio­n of invalidity was suspended until Dlamini Zuma, after consultati­on with other ministers, amends and republishe­s the regulation­s.

He gave Dlamini Zuma 14 days to comply with his order.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa