Daily News

SA must embrace winds of change

- HARTMUT WINKLER Professor of physics at the University of Johannesbu­rg

SOUTH Africa has experience­d power shortages with rolling blackouts on an unpreceden­ted scale this year. This state of affairs is largely due to technical failures of its ageing fleet of coalpowere­d plants.

The present power-generation shortage is due to the power utility Eskom’s failure to add sufficient new electricit­y generation to the grid.

This has meant the utility had to keep ailing, old power stations going beyond their projected life span.

The coal plants are prone to frequent renewed breakdowns. In addition, their maintenanc­e and parts replacemen­ts are becoming prohibitiv­ely expensive.

Given the major contributi­on that burning coal makes to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, electricit­y generation from coal is in any case globally viewed as extremely problemati­c, with major pressure and incentives to scale this down.

South Africa is currently ranked eighth in the world in terms of the total amount of coal used for electricit­y generation.

This is based on country-by-country global statistics on coal-power generation.

The statistics are produced on an annual basis and are widely available.

The largest coal user by far is China, followed by India, though these are also the world’s most populous nations.

In terms of energy consumptio­n from coal per capita, South Africa also ranks among the highest in the world with just under 16 500kwh per person per annum

This is in line with other highly coal-dependent countries.

It is roughly on par with China, South Korea and Australia and slightly lower than the top three, Estonia, Kazakhstan and Taiwan.

When it comes to dependency on coal power plants, South Africa is in a class of its own – 85% of its electricit­y is produced in coal-powered plants.

This is way higher than all countries – bar two.

Only Mongolia and Kosovo have a higher dependency. They have tiny population­s. Mongolia has just more than 3 million people and Kosovo just under 2 million. South Africa’s population is more than 60 million.

South Africa’s percentage of electricit­y from coal has decreased only marginally by 9 percentage points since 1985.

This is in contrast to other previously coal-dependent countries that have made much more dramatic moves to carbon-free power. For example, the UK got 58% of its electricit­y from coal in 1985. Today this is down to 2%, partly to massive investment­s in wind power.

South Africa has climatic conditions suitable for solar and wind power, and should in theory similarly be able to reduce its coal dependence.

A drive towards low-carbon electricit­y generation, however, requires government­al support, which has largely not been forthcomin­g in the past decade.

As it’s a country rich in coal deposits, South Africa’s proliferat­ion of coal plants was to be expected in the 1970s and 1980s.

Because it’s also a water-scarce country, possibilit­ies for hydropower plants were always limited. And while one nuclear plant was constructe­d, the increasing isolation of apartheid-era South Africa made it difficult to access internatio­nal expertise needed for further nuclear developmen­ts.

Renewable technologi­es are relatively new. They only became commercial­ly competitiv­e about 10 years ago, and were not previously considered a viable alternativ­e to fossil fuels.

When the need for more power generation in South Africa became apparent in the first years of the millennium, a time when the electrific­ation of previously unconnecte­d communitie­s was booming, the choice was made to construct two further coal plants, Medupi and Kusile.

These builds have proved technologi­cally flawed, way over budget and badly behind schedule.

When the first series of rolling power cuts had to be implemente­d in 2007, it became clear that energy-security planning and implementa­tion

had gone wrong. The subsequent electricit­y plan from 2010 recommende­d major developmen­ts in nuclear and renewable energy.

In 2015, the government stalled the constructi­on of planned new solar and wind plants in favour of a highly controvers­ial and an ultimately blocked nuclear deal with Russia. Since the resumption of the renewable electricit­y programme in 2018, some wind and solar plants have been built but at nowhere near the rate needed to dent the dominant role of coal.

In spite of the electricit­y crisis having become urgent and obvious, with several hours of power cuts during as many as half of the days this year, there has been no unity in purpose to tackle the issue.

There are loud calls, also supported by influentia­l individual­s within the governing ANC to maintain South Africa’s coal-intensive trajectory.

The proponents argue that the coal power stations can simply be managed better, and that any new power generation should mainly be focused on nuclear and gas.

The opposing view is that South Africa should align with the global trends to massively develop new solar and wind power plants. Its advocates justify this option by pointing to the lower cost of these technologi­es, short project completion times and environmen­tal considerat­ions.

In spite of weather conditions that are superbly suited for wind and solar farms, South Africa has been extremely slow to kick-start its renewable energy-generating infrastruc­ture.

South Africa could have followed the example of China. Although the largest user of coal in the world, it is already making major moves towards a far lower carbon footprint. Over the five-year period from 2021 to 2025, China plans to add solar and wind plants producing 570GW of electricit­y.

To put this figure into perspectiv­e, this is roughly 10n times South Africa’s present total power capacity.

The office of President Cyril Ramaphosa comes across as sympatheti­c to mass renewable-energy developmen­ts. It has aligned itself with the recently published Just Energy Transition Investment Plan.

The plan envisages accelerate­d building of more wind and solar farms to replace decommissi­oned coal power stations. It also tries to mitigate lowered economic activity and job losses in the coal fields and adjacent coal plants. It goes further in exploring energy exports in the form of green hydrogen, an energy storage medium fed by renewables, and the current global move towards electric vehicles.

If supported and implemente­d, the plan will result in better power supply in only three to five years from now. This, however, presuppose­s that the government will rally behind this initiative and work together rather than sending contradict­ory messages.

In the interim, power shortages will persist in South Africa.

 ?? ?? KUSILE power plant in the east of Johannesbu­rg. The constructi­on of Medupi and Kusile coal plants have proved technologi­cally flawed, way over budget and badly behind schedule, the writer says. | African News Agency (ANA) archives
KUSILE power plant in the east of Johannesbu­rg. The constructi­on of Medupi and Kusile coal plants have proved technologi­cally flawed, way over budget and badly behind schedule, the writer says. | African News Agency (ANA) archives
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa