Legally, Walus must be freed

CHIEF Justice Raymond Zondo, by ordering the release of Chris Hani’s killer, Janusz Walus, demonstrates that the law is what it is. The law is not exclusive to black people, it is for all the people of this land.

Many black people objected again and again when Walus applied for parole. Yet he was not asking to be an exception; he was applying for his rights to be recognised by the courts according to the laws of South Africa.

I understand why Chris Hani’s widow, Limpho Hani, objects to Walus being released. My son was murdered and if his murderer is ever jailed, I would want him to remain in prison for all of his life.

However, the law is the law, unless it is changed. Generally, the law will not be changed unless a fault is discovered in the existing law.

Walus has served his time, according to the law as it stands today. Because Walus committed a crime during the apartheid era and because the murder was a white-on-black killing, it does not mean Justice Zondo must confer with the EFF or SACP before he reaches a decision.

He has studied the laws of SA for most of his life and has always demonstrated great knowledge and wisdom, and always takes great care to abide by what our laws dictate. He cannot listen to what the public suggests. He must work within the rules.

The release of Walus is as long overdue as is the conviction of Zuma.

To Limpho Hani I can only say: I understand that you can never forgive, as I can never forgive the people who murdered my son, but there comes a time when one has to abide by the laws of South Africa. RICHARD STEWART | Linmeyer