Daily News

African researcher­s are ready to share more openly

- LARA SKELLY AND ELISHA CHIWARE Skelly is an Open Research Manager: Data & Methods at Loughborou­gh University, England. Chiware is a library director and associate professor at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology

LIBRARIANS are the curators of creativity. They collect success stories and share them with the world. Traditiona­lly, the success was from published authors, which libraries shared with the local community. More recently, the model has been flipped: libraries have started to collect from the local community to share with everyone.

In academic libraries, this is best seen in the work of repository librarians. They collect not only the published output of researcher­s but also all the digital ephemera that might be created through the research process: the data, the software, the code.

The movement that makes all the ingredient­s of a research project available on the internet, with as little restrictio­n as possible, has been termed “Open Research” or “Open Science”. This umbrella term includes open access, open data and open methods.

The work involved in open science pulls in researcher­s, librarians, funders, policymake­rs and the public. Its benefits flow back to the librarians too. Some of the benefits include trust, greater access to research and more collaborat­ion among researcher­s.

Adoption is under way, evidenced by the number of open access policies, the growth of open science standards and policies or the number of times it has been searched in Google over the past few years, but Africa has been slower to take up the change.

We undertook a two-part study to understand the root of Africa’s slow uptake of open science practices.

Positive attitudes

Using the data from the State of Open Data surveys, we looked at how researcher­s who self-identify as African think about open data.

The analysis centred on researcher­s’ attitudes towards three areas: Sharing their own data.

The shared data of others.

The open data ecosystem in place to enable wider data sharing. We found the attitudes of researcher­s in 28 countries in Africa had changed. They had become more positive about open science, but they were not very different from those of researcher­s elsewhere.

All were in an upward trend over time. Motivation­s and fears were much the same too. The African researcher­s’ attitudes towards open science indicate they are ready for a policy that enables open science practices. But what about the policymake­rs?

Policy readiness

Our second study, a systematic review, found there was no shortage of examples of open science policies, nor was there a lack of implementa­tion frameworks that could guide African open science stakeholde­rs to develop their own policies that would set out the open science intent and delineate the roles and responsibi­lities of stakeholde­rs and researcher­s.

Some African countries are already doing well in open science. Botswana is one; another is South Africa. The country’s National Research Foundation is working towards an African open science platform. This is a collaborat­ion of several national and internatio­nal entities.

However, the lack of policy synergies appears to be holding back the African open science environmen­t. Other researcher­s have put it like this:

African science systems largely operate independen­tly of each other, creating silos of incompatib­le policies, practices and data sets that are not mutually consistent or inter-operable.

Another study confirmed this. Without policy clarity, there is no impetus to invest in the technology and infrastruc­ture to support open science. Creating confusion is the tension between various stakeholde­rs, some on ethical grounds and others on commercial foundation­s.

Benefits of open research

Many stakeholde­rs – funders, institutio­ns, government­s, and publishers – are encouragin­g researcher­s to work as openly as possible because of the benefits it brings.

These include: Trust Accessibil­ity Collaborat­ion Replicatio­n of findings

Cost effectiven­ess.

The transparen­cy of sharing the detail of the research builds trust in that research process, as others can review and verify the findings.

Removing pay-walls equates to greater accessibil­ity, particular­ly for those who are under-resourced.

With fewer restrictio­ns comes the opportunit­y for improved collaborat­ion among scientists and between scientists and the public.

Sharing the fine details of the research process enhances replicatio­n, allowing others to build upon the existing science and make findings in less time.

Funders need not pay for the collection of the same data or the developmen­t of a method. Because much research is publicly funded, this translates to better use of tax money.

These benefits add up to a greater chance that the research will have a positive impact.

The way forward

Librarians like us are already smoothing the way to open science, despite the lack of infrastruc­ture and policy support. We have simply been doing what those in our profession have always done: widening access to informatio­n.

Librarians have always worked in the midst of fractious stakeholde­rs, from government­s and publishers to funders and communitie­s, finding creative solutions to new problems. Would you expect anything less from the curators of creativity?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa