Diamond Fields Advertiser

TWO POINT FOUR BILLION

Auditor-general’s shocking report on NC finances

- SARAH EVANS STAFF REPORTER

TWO POINT FOUR BILLION – this is the amount of money that was irregularl­y spent in the 2011/12 financial year across all department­s and public entities in the Northern Cape government.

It is almost double the amount irregularl­y spent in the previous financial year, and 41 percent of this amount was irregularl­y spent by the Department of Health.

This amount, according to Cope in the Provincial Legislatur­e, could have eradicated the provincial housing backlog by building 43 636 RDP houses at a cost of R55 000 per house; built five new mental health hospitals at the contracted price of R420 million; and fixed 102 times the amount of potholes fixed this year.

The Auditor-General gave an overview of the state of the provincial government’s finances to the Provincial Legislatur­e yesterday.

The A-G revealed that 842 government contracts were awarded to employees or other state officials in the past year, while this number was a measly 38 in the previous financial year.

One contract was illegally awarded to family members of State employees, although the AG’s presentati­on does not state which contract this was. More detailed informatio­n will be revealed when the department­s present its annual reports to the legislatur­e next week.

The sheer scale of illegality in the awarding of contracts was reflected in the audits, as every single department received findings with regards to procuremen­t and contract management, and unauthoris­ed, irregular and fruitless and wasteful expenditur­e. Only three government department­s did not receive findings with regards to expenditur­e management.

No department or public entity received a “clean audit”, which is financiall­y unqualifie­d with no findings. The Department of Health received its tenth disclaimer in a row – the worst type of audit outcome possible. Five department­s and three public entities received unqualifie­d audits with findings, while seven department­s and five public entities received a qualified audit opinion with findings.

Qualified audit outcomes either arise when one or more financial statements do not conform with the relevant accounting legislatio­n, or could not be verified.

Of the total department­s and public entities audited, three improved from the previous financial year, four regressed, and 12 remained unchanged. The department­s that regressed from a financiall­y unqualifie­d opinion with findings to a qualified audit in the last year are: Agricultur­e, Land Reform and Rural Developmen­t; Economic Developmen­t and Tourism; the Provincial Legislatur­e; and Roads and Public Works.

Officials from the AuditorGen­eral’s office in Pretoria were scathing about the Maloof Money Cup yesterday, and said this event was one of the main causes of the regression in the Department of Economic Developmen­t and Tourism’s finances.

This is because the AuditorGen­eral’s office was unable to obtain any contracts and documentat­ion related to the event. Officials described the event as a “drain on the fiscus” that was not budgeted for.

The Department of Agricultur­e and the Provincial Legisla- ture, meanwhile, regressed due to possible instances of fraud.

The Department of Co-operative Governance, Human Settlement­s and Traditiona­l Affairs (Coghsta) was the only department which showed an improvemen­t, moving from a qualified opinion with findings to an unqualifie­d audit opinion with findings.

Education, Sport Arts and Culture, the Office of the Premier, the Provincial Treasury, Social Developmen­t, Environmen­tal Affairs and Nature Conservati­on, and the Department of Transport, Safety and Liaison all remained stagnant with either unqualifie­d opinions with findings or qualified opinions with findings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa