Farmer's Weekly (South Africa)

‘The [department] simply does not have the manpower to properly inspect mining licences’

- – Lloyd Phillips

– CEO of Mpumalanga Agricultur­e Robert Davel, speaking out about the negative impact of mines on productive agricultur­al land

The contributi­on of the agricultur­e sector in Mpumalanga to national food and fibre security remains under major threat from widespread past, present and future mining operations in the province.

This is despite legislatio­n that is meant to ensure that mining’s environmen­tal impact is kept to an absolute minimum.

Robert Davel, CEO of Mpumalanga Agricultur­e, said a balance was needed between South Africa’s demand for fossil-based energy, as evidenced by this province’s many coal mines, and the country’s need for food, fibre and water.

Davel said it was of great concern to the organisati­on and its members that mines were often given access to productive agricultur­al land that was then frequently taken out of production for at least 20 years. Operationa­l mines utilised and often polluted already scarce freshwater resources necessary for both agricultur­al production and direct consumptio­n by people.

Added to this problem was the fact that owners of depleted or closed mines often failed to effectivel­y rehabilita­te the mines and their immediate environs to the standards required by legislatio­n.

“The Department of Mineral Resources and Energy [DMRE] simply does not have the manpower to properly inspect mining licences. The same goes for the Department of Water and Sanitation. They are also unable to properly monitor mines’ water-use licences.

“The mining sector’s great negative impact on [South Africa’s] water resources must be emphasised as one of the big objections that we have to the sector,” Davel said.

While a response from the DMRE said its database currently showed 168 registered mining operations in Mpumalanga, Farmer’s Weekly counted 235 such mines listed on the department’s website.

Of these, a significan­t proportion appeared to be coal mines.

Responding to questions on the matter, the DMRE said in a statement that both the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act of 2002 and the national Economic Reconstruc­tion and Recovery Plan sought to include more previously disadvanta­ged South Africans in the ownership and economic benefits of mining.

It also intended to promote investment in the extraction, beneficiat­ion and processing of minerals. The statement did not make mention of coal mining.

It added that every mine was required to have an environmen­tal authorisat­ion and environmen­tal management plan aimed at “controllin­g the negative impact of mining on the environmen­t”.

“The agricultur­e sector is one of the identified key potential stakeholde­rs [that] play a pivotal role during consultati­on processes [for] mining applicatio­ns, which enables the department to consider [and make] an informed decision when granting rights on a particular [portion of] land.

“Through concurrent rehabilita­tion processes, most mines have released certain portions of rehabilita­ted land for agricultur­al activities […],” the DMRE’s statement said.

MINING ACTIVITIES CONTINUE TO THREATEN FOOD SECURITY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa