Farmer's Weekly (South Africa)

South Africa’s efforts to tackle its energy crisis lack urgency and coherence

Hartmut Winkler, professor of physics at the University of Johannesbu­rg, unpacks South Africa’s current energy challenges, and provides some insights into what is needed for the way forward.

- • This article was originally published on The Conversati­on. To read the original article, visit bit.ly/35a3V9a.

South Africa’s electricit­y infrastruc­ture has been degrading over the past decade, with both scheduled and unschedule­d power outages on the increase. Despite slowed economic activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the country experience­d 1 130 hours of planned power cuts in 2021, the highest ever.

This not only leads to anger and frustratio­n among the public, but also clearly handicaps businesses and their productivi­ty. The alleviatio­n of the electricit­y crisis is therefore a critical preconditi­on for the country’s economic recovery. This is why observers have been watching President Cyril Ramaphosa’s strategy and its implementa­tion with much anticipati­on. In the 2021 State of the Nation Address (SONA), Ramaphosa listed “the rapid expansion of our energy generation capacity” as one of government’s five top priorities. This year he reiterated that these had not changed. It would clearly be a major deliverabl­e on which his government’s success would be judged.

In his 2022 SONA, he didn’t touch on any issue that would have raised confidence that his government is making progress on energy.

He didn’t give any indication­s of plans to review the Integrated Resource Plan. The last Integrated Resource Plan was adopted in 2019. The plan, which guides power station developmen­t and associated timelines, should be reviewed every two years. A revised plan is needed, especially in view of the rapid developmen­ts in energy-generating technologi­es. The 2019 plan is effectivel­y already obsolete, and updated projection­s are likely to lead to substantia­lly changed, optimal electricit­y-generating scenarios.

CONSTRUCTI­ON DELAYS

The 2019 Integrated Resource Plan made provision for immediate action to construct 1 600MW of wind power, 1 000MW of solar power and 513MW of electricit­y storage capacity to bring online by 2022. But these are only expected to be ready in early 2024. Projects due to be completed in 2023 include another 2 600MW of wind and solar and 750MW of new coal power, but the process

to identify the sites and developers hasn’t started. This means that all these initiative­s are two years behind schedule.

FACING HEADWINDS

The coal project is facing severe headwinds as a consequenc­e of changed perception­s about coal due to its role in global warming. But there’s no excuse for the delays in initiating the officially endorsed plan to develop the renewable energy plants.

Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe, the implemente­r-inchief of the Integrated Resource Plan, has been a vocal supporter of the formerly dominant (but now increasing­ly less popular) coal, gas and nuclear sectors. Most recently, however, he has tried to reassure the solar and wind sectors that, despite perception­s to the contrary, he also supports renewable energy.

South Africa cannot solve a pressing energy crisis while senior government figures seem to openly disagree on the way forward. The message of joint commitment to the implementa­tion of the electricit­y plan is therefore to be welcomed. Confidence would be further cemented by concerted attempts to reclaim lagging roll-out timelines and immediate moves to update the energy plan.

In the 2021 SONA, the president said the procuremen­t of the first and second sets of renewable energy developmen­ts would commence in February and August 2021 respective­ly.

The first target was achieved, but the second was postponed twice, first to January 2022, and then to late March 2022.

In this year’s address, Ramaphosa indicated that the call for applicatio­ns to procure the now severely delayed storage allocation as well as 3 000MW of gasgenerat­ing capacity would be made later this year. This is insufficie­nt to catch up with the backlog of new power plants.

The president also steered clear of controvers­ial energy developmen­ts. He didn’t say anything about the completion of the massive Kusile coal plant, which together with its twin, Medupi, has been bedevilled by massive delays, cost overruns and inexplicab­le breakdowns of still-new machinery.

He was also silent on the 1 500MW of new coal plants envisaged under the Integrated Resource Plan, which would normally be expected to be allocated to developers soon.

This may be a deliberate effort to play down any ambitions the country may have on this front so that these do not jeopardise R131 billion in foreign grants and loans expected in exchange for adopting a climatefri­endly energy developmen­t path.

Also not mentioned were the controvers­ial gas ship emergency power initiative and the refurbishi­ng of the Koeberg nuclear plant.

Instead, he praised a Northern Cape green hydrogen generation initiative, a storage technology that is mostly envisaged to work in tandem with renewable energy generation, even though this programme is still in the relatively early planning stages.

The president’s biggest successes in the past year have been in regulatory matters. He eased power production licensing requiremen­ts to make it much easier for entities to set up power plants of up to 100MW. This eased a bottleneck that has led to many more mines, municipali­ties and other private entities taking steps to establish their own power-generating capacity.

In his speech, Ramaphosa highlighte­d that this capacity was projected to reach 4 000MW for mines and 1 400MW for municipali­ties. This is considerab­ly higher than would have been envisaged as little as five years ago and will go some way in bridging the electricit­y shortfall.

To convince a sceptical nation that the energy crisis was being dealt with, the president needed something new. To do that, on the day of the address, government released for public comment a draft revised electricit­y bill. This includes several proposed reforms that would erode the monopoly of the national electricit­y utility, Eskom.

The draft bill further establishe­s the operationa­l framework for new entities that would result from an unbundled Eskom, a process that is expected to reach completion this year. Debates on the impact of this new bill will be prominent in the months to come, and the outcome of this process will decisively shape the future of electricit­y developmen­ts in South Africa.

In particular, the bill will boost small-scale private electricit­y production, also referred to as “embedded” generation, and outstrip its contributi­on projected in the current Integrated Resource Plan. Technologi­cal advances in electricit­y storage are also making it viable to use larger fractions of intermitte­nt solar and wind power than previously anticipate­d. This calls for a redetermin­ation of South Africa’s optimal electricit­y mix through a new Integrated Resource Plan. The work towards this must start now.

 ?? PIXABAY ?? Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe has tried to reassure the solar and wind sectors that he also supports renewable energy.
PIXABAY Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe has tried to reassure the solar and wind sectors that he also supports renewable energy.
 ?? FW ARCHIVE ?? South Africa‘s energy sector is being guided by an outdated Integrated Resource Plan, says Prof Hartmut Winkler of the University of Johannesbu­rg.
FW ARCHIVE South Africa‘s energy sector is being guided by an outdated Integrated Resource Plan, says Prof Hartmut Winkler of the University of Johannesbu­rg.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa